Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />Water and Storage Needs Assessment <br />SECWCD/Assessment Enterprise, ' <br />December 10, 1998 <br /> <br />District water' users; projection of future populations and demands for water in the municipal <br />sector; an assessment of historic agricultUral water use; assessment of water and storage needs;,and <br />evaluation of potential water supply storage' and management options for the District to consider. <br />The District is shown on Figure ES-l. <br /> <br />The District entiti~ current1y~e an average approximately 1 million acre-feet (at) peryear of <br />which 80 percent is for irrigation. H agricultural use is held constant, total water use in the ' <br />District is projected to increase to nearly 1.2 million'a!per year Wlder a ''high growth" scenario. <br /> <br />Key findings pfthe Assessment Project studies are summarized below: <br /> <br />1. District population, Figure ES-2, is expected to ,increase by 572,000 to 1,006,000 <br />persons, depending on whether a "base" or ''high'' .forecast is used Municipal <br />water demands in the District's service area are expected to be approximately <br />95,000 to 187,000 af hi~er than the current levels, Figure ES-3. The larger <br />incremental water demand is based on a population growth rate equivalent to 2.3 <br />percent per year. <br /> <br />, , <br />2. The major municipal water supply entities in the District, and ,many of the smaller <br />entities, have adopted water conservation measures that meet or exceed <br />requirements established by the CWCB's Office of Water Conservation. Typical <br />conservation measur~ implemented in the municipal sector include water meters, <br />water-efficient fixtures and appli~ces, public education, water uSe audits, water <br />'efficiency ordinances,' water reuse, and other measUres. The water demand <br />forecasts prepared for the Assessment Project incl~ded a reduction in future per <br />~pita water use to reflect successful conservation efforts~, On a District-wide basis, <br />current per capita use averages 213 gallons per capita per day (goo); future use is <br />estimated to be 182 gcd, reflecting over a 1 o percent reduction in per capita use. <br /> <br />3. Water resources, available to municipal entities are generally adequate to meet <br />demands for the l;lase case scenario (97,000 'af of additional demand),. except for <br />certain ,entities ~ the FOWltain Valley and several towns West of Pueblo. <br />Approximately 21;300 af of additional water supply will be needed (Wlder base <br />projections), unless other entities are willing to reallocate water supplies that <br />exceed, their forecast needs. <br /> <br />4. For the high growth scenario (187,000 af of additional water demand), the total <br />additional water supply need is estimated to be 81,800 af, as shown in the table <br />below, primarily in Colorado Springs, the other Fountain Valley Authority (FV A) <br />entities, and several towns west of Pueblo. The Colorado SpringsIFY A demands ' <br /> <br />I GEl ~nsultants, Inc. <br /> <br />-ii- <br /> <br />974111'InIUlTEXl'-A. WPD <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />-J <br />J <br />I <br />I <br />11 <br />'I <br />il <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />