My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SalvagedWater
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
SalvagedWater
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:17:45 PM
Creation date
10/8/2007 2:19:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8420.500
Description
South Platte River Basin Task Force
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
7/12/2007
Author
Holland and Hart
Title
Report to SPTF
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
July 13, 2007 <br />Page 5 <br />Legislative Creation of a Salvage Water Credit <br />Without limiting the available alte rnatives, an option for consider ation by the task force would <br />be a legislative proposal to allo w the creation of a salvage water credit that could be claimed by <br />persons who reduce naturally occurring consump tive uses like evaporation, sublimation, or <br />evapotranspiration associated with phreatophyte s. The countervailing policy considerations <br />outlined in the Shelton Farms decision should be carefully asse ssed. Possible provisions of such <br />legislation could include: <br />Creation of appropriate district authorities with right to condemn on a sel ective basis, as <br />suggested by Justice Day in Shelton Farms ; <br />Total or partial credit for salvage. For example, the salvager could claim a percentage of <br />the water made available, while the remainde r accrued to the stream for use by senior <br />priorities; <br />Credit only for salvage of water that was never historically av ailable to senior <br />appropriators (consistent with th e “water thieves” reasoning of Shelton Farms , but <br />contrary to the more e xpansive rule announced in R.J.A., Inc. ); <br />“Target” incentives based on particular resource objectives. For example a special <br />salvage credit could be created for removal of tamarisk (salt cedar); <br />Environmental review process to protect other resource valu es such as native vegetation, <br />wildlife habitat, and soil conservation. <br />3734522_6.DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.