My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HoleInTheRiverHistoryOfGroundwater
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
HoleInTheRiverHistoryOfGroundwater
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:17:39 PM
Creation date
10/8/2007 9:36:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8420.500
Description
South Platte River Basin Task Force
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
7/12/2007
Author
Nicolai A. Kryloff
Title
Hole In the River Draft Report Submitted to SPTF
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
electricity to rural cooperatives in the South Platte valley, whic h in turn sold it to pump <br />55 <br />irrigators. This new power source coincided with the arrival of cente r-pivot irrigation, <br />patented in 1952 by Coloradoan Frank Zybach. His system consisted of elevated pipes <br />and nozzles, attached to wheeled towers, wh ich rotated around pivots like the hands of a <br />clock. The invention allowed for irrigation on hilly and uneven land, which could not be <br />56 <br />reached by ditches without costly leveling. This system, enlivened by electricity, <br />combined with pump irrigation to bring mo re than 30,000 acres of new land into <br />57 <br />production by 1960. At the same time, however, water from the Colorado-Big <br />Thompson project masked the effect of wells on the flowing river, offsetting the expected <br />58 <br />reductions in seepage water caused by pumping. In essence, the addition of this trans- <br />mountain water stabilized su rface flows while it encour aged groundwater use by <br />supplying cheap electricity. These oppositional yet complimentary influences preserved a <br />tentative accommodation between water use and availabilit y, even as groundwater use <br />and irrigated acreage expanded. Simultane ously, however, the balance was being <br />disrupted by declining water tabl es in groundwater-reliant areas. <br />Among the areas most threatened by deple tion in the South Platte valley was the <br />Bijou Basin, located along one of the river’s ty pically dry southern tributaries. Farmers in <br />the region were almost entirely dependent on groundwater for irrigation. Located several <br />55 <br />Colorado Rural Electric News, “Electricity Sold from Colorado-Big Thompson Project Boosts <br />Economy,” August 1963. Also see J.M. Dille, Irrigation in Morgan County (Fort Morgan: Farmers State <br />Bank, 1960), 50. <br />56 <br />Colorado Rural Electric News, August 1963. Also Thomas Cech and Andy Jones, Colorado Water Law <br />for Non-Lawyers (unpublished manuscript in possession of the author), 27. <br />57 <br /> J.M. Dille, Irrigation in Morgan County (Fort Morgan: Farmers State Bank, 1960), 51-52. However, <br />irrigated acreage was already expanding in the valley befo re electrification arrived. See White and Theis, 9. <br />Box 15, GDC. <br />58 <br /> For more on the “masking” effect of water from the Colorado-Big Thompson project, see Lawrence J. <br />MacDonnell, “Colorado’s Law of Underground Water: A Look at the South Platte Basin and Beyond.” <br />University of Colorado Law Review 59, no. 3 (Summer 1988): 579-625. <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.