My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HoleInTheRiverHistoryOfGroundwater
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
HoleInTheRiverHistoryOfGroundwater
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:17:39 PM
Creation date
10/8/2007 9:36:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8420.500
Description
South Platte River Basin Task Force
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
7/12/2007
Author
Nicolai A. Kryloff
Title
Hole In the River Draft Report Submitted to SPTF
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
distinct advantages over surface supplies. Fi rst, its availability was not immediately <br />affected by a sudden absence of precipitati on, and second, it was available precisely <br />when and where a farmer needed it. This second advantage was especially important in <br />places such as Prospect Valley, where surf ace irrigation was inefficient. Along this <br />tributary of the South Platte, ditch water wa s unreliable and was allotted on a rotational <br />basis. A farmer might not need water when his turn came to use it; other times, it might <br />be unavailable when his crops needed it most. Groundwater irri gation solved this <br />problem by providing water on demand, and Prospect Valley farmers embraced the <br />42 <br />technique fully. Some even sold surface rights to finance down-payments on wells. Use <br />of underground water both provided protectio n against drought and offered farmers <br />greater control over the timi ng and application of irriga tion water, increasing its <br />popularity among South Platte farmers. <br />But these characteristics alone were in sufficient to fuel the boom – technology <br />also played an important ro le. Centrifugal pumps, built in England as early as 1754, <br />underwent a series of revisions in the early 1900s to increa se their efficiency. Improved <br />rotary drills soon followed, allowing the wi der bore necessary to install improved <br />43 <br />pumps. Oil and gasoline gradually replaced steam power, and by the 1930s, rebuilt <br />44 <br />automobile engines were driving high-speed pumping equipment. As late as 1957, <br />45 <br />tractors still powered ne arly a fifth of pumps in the South Platte basin. But there were <br />cheaper alternatives. High-speed diesel en gines were introduced in the late 1930s, <br />providing efficiency at about a quarter the fuel consumption of gasoline. Stil l, the initial <br />42 <br /> W.E. Code, “Pumping in Prospect Valley,” Western Farm Life , 1 May 1938. <br />43 <br /> For a thorough description of centrifuga l pump and rotary drill technology, see Green, Land of the <br />Underground Rain, 38-61. <br />44 <br /> Green, 126-127. <br />45 <br /> Bjorklund and Brown, 2. <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.