My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
20b
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
20b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:37:06 PM
Creation date
9/28/2007 12:09:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/18/2007
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- 22 - <br /> <br />. Denver Water will conduct a small 2.5 month seeding operations with a heavy <br />evaluation component at the Winter Park Ski area. Denver Water will get $8K LB and <br />$10K CWCB to match with $40K of Denver Water funding for operations. <br /> <br />Two evaluation proposals from WET International and the Desert Research Institute are being <br />funded by the LB and CWCB to conduct an evaluation of the Winter Park seeding and are <br />designed to answer the questions: <br /> <br />1) Is the typical mountain valley generator program working well? OR Are we seeing <br />high ice crystal concentrations in the intended target area? and, <br />2) Using transport and dispersion computer modeling offer some answers as to why or <br />why not are we seeding high ice crystal concentrations in the target area? <br /> <br />The first proposal is for $1 OOK and will be split by the LB and CWCB and will install an NCAR <br />ice nucleus counter and other meteorological equipment at Winter Park and collect data for 2.5 <br />months using a team of retired USBR scientists with a collective history in the field of 130 years. <br />The data generated from this proposal will then be used as input into the DR! computer modeling <br />proposal that is $53K. The DRI proposal is being split by the LB and CWCB. Both proposals <br />together accomplish two tasks from staff's point of view. The first is to show how to effectively <br />evaluate cloud seeding operations based on our collective body of knowledge and successes in <br />other states. <br /> <br />The second is to get the CWCB a bit more into the role of statewide technical assistance and <br />funding of independent evaluations. Local sponsors have limited funding but want to know if <br />their programs are working well. Program sponsors will be curious about the outcome of the <br />Denver Water study no doubt. In Nevada, Texas, and North Dakota a significant state presence <br />in the design, execution of operations, and independent evaluation of programs leads to better <br />documentation and more confidence in programs. This is a direction staff is heading towards <br />that is using some state resources to pay for cloud seeding and other state resources to evaluate, <br />refine, and enhance existing programs. CWCB Member input on this issue and new CWCB <br />Weather Modification Program direction is welcomed and needed. <br /> <br />COLORADO RIVER UPDATES: <br />. Status of FE IS on Lower Basin Shortage Guidelines and Coordinated Operations of <br />Lakes Powell and Mead under Low Reservoir Conditions - Arizona still has concerns <br />with certain provisions in the proposed Guidelines the would implement the <br />"Intentionally Created Surplus" (lCS) program in the Lower Basin. An ICS <br />conservation program is the major component in the effort to minimize shortages in <br />the Lower Basin. An ICS program also helps to maintain higher storage levels in <br />Lakes Powell and Mead thereby increasing the drought protections provided by the <br />reservoirs. In addition Lower Basin interests continue to express concerns with the <br />inclusion of protections for the minimum power pool in Lake Powell in the <br />computation of the 602(a) storage requirements for Lake Powell. The Upper Basin <br />considers protections for the minimum power pool at Lake Powell very important not <br />only in the sense of providing a clean renewable source of electrical energy, a large <br />share of which goes to power providers in Arizona, but also from the standpoint that <br />these power revenues help to repay the costs associated with the development of <br />Flood Protection. Water Project Planning and Finance. Sn-eam and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.