Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Repetitive Loss Stmctures <br />7 - 10 <br />4-6 <br />1- 3 <br />o <br /> <br />Value <br />3 <br />2 <br />1 <br />o <br /> <br />Number of Class I and II Dams <br />10 + <br />6-9 <br />1- 5 <br />o <br /> <br />Value <br />3 <br />2 <br />1 <br />o <br /> <br />The values of the four factors were computed and each value ranked in accordance with <br />the procedure below. <br /> <br />Value <br />10 + <br />6-9 <br />1- 5 <br />o <br /> <br />Risk Assessment <br />High <br />Moderate <br />Low <br />Very Low <br /> <br />The results of the risk assessment are presented on Figure 1. <br /> <br />D. Changes in Development Patterns <br /> <br />Information in this section of the document is intended to reflect changes in development <br />for jurisdictions in flood hazard prone areas. Changes in development patterns can <br />generally be related to changes in population. Consequently, census data was utilized to <br />identify the potential changes. The 2004 update to the NHMP 2001 umbrella document <br />contained population data, based on the 2000 census, and the percent change in <br />population since 1990. The Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) updated this <br />information in 2007 as shown on the following page. <br /> <br />ASSESSING VULNERABILITY OF STATE FACILITIES <br /> <br />A. Types of State Owned/Operated Facilities <br /> <br />The 2004 update to the NHMP 2001 umbrella document specifically identified the <br />types of State owned or operated critical facilities located in flood hazard areas. The <br /> <br />28 <br />