17 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Table 5. Present Status of the Map Modernization Program in Colorado COUNTY STATUS RANK COUNTY STATUS RANK Denver EfTective 2 Rio Grande 102 JefTerson EfTective 3 Elbert 103 El Paso 4 Lake 110 Arapahoe Preliminary 5 Park 112 Adams EfTective 6 Clear Creek EfTective 119 Boulder Preliminary 9 Archuleta In production 121 Larimer Preliminary 10 Huerf:1no 122 Pueblo In production 13 Saguache 131 Weld Preliminarv 15 Yuma 144 Douglas EfTective 18 Kit Carson 148 Mesa In production 20 Lincoln 149 Fremont In production 31 Grand Preliminary 158 Garfield In production 36 Bent 160 Broomfield EfTective 37 San Miguel 162 La Plata In production 38 Gilpin 174 Logan 42 Ouray 175 Morgan 43 Rio Blanco 176 Routt EfTecti ve 46 Conejos 179 Otero 57 Phillips 192 Delta 59 Custer 194 Montrose 60 Costilla No study 197 Montezuma In production 68 Crowley 214 Summit 69 Dolores 216 Alamosa 70 Hinsdale 248 Eagle Preliminary 73 Mineral No study 250 Monat 75 Sedgwick No study 251 Gunnison 76 Washington No study 254 Prowers 81 Jackson No study 267 Las Animas 83 Baca No studv 274 ChafTee 84 San Juan No study 278 Pitkin EfTective 86 Kiowa No study 283 Teller In production 88 Cheyenne No studv 288 Source: Colorado Water Conservation Board 2007 Information provided by the local emergency managers was compiled by emergency management region; the data for flood hazards presented below was extracted from the summary table provided in Appendix E of the 2004 update to the NHMP umbrella document. SUMMARY OF HAZARDS BY REGION AND TYPE COLORADO ALL HAZARDS EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT REGIONS TYPE OF WEST HAZARD Flood High SOUTH WEST High SOUTH EAST High SOUTH SOUTH CENTRAL High SAN LUIS NORTH EAST High NORTH CENTRAL High NORTH WEST High High LOCAL EMERGENCY MANAGERS SURVEY, 2003 24