My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00146 (2)
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00146 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:18:01 AM
Creation date
9/19/2007 4:06:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2005
Title
Western States Water Council - San Antonio, TX., October 18-21, 2005
CWCB Section
Administration
Description
Western States Water Council - San Antonio, TX., October 18-21, 2005
Publications - Doc Type
Water Policy
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
343
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Western States Water Council <br />Water Resources Committee Minutes <br /> <br />Seattle, Washington <br />July 14, 2005 <br /> <br />Jeanine Jones: "Language in our past letters has expressed the need that the program have a higher priority." <br /> <br />It was discussed in depth and changes were suggested, before it was approved with the understanding <br />that there would be further changes negotiated with other signatory agencies and it was agreed that Hal <br />Simpson as Chairman could accept such changes on the Council's behalf. Dave Vogler moved adoption of <br />the letter as our policy position, and Weir Labatt was the second. It was approved. <br /> <br />A 2nd draft USGS letter addressed to Interior Secretary Gale Norton declared the Council's strong <br />support for the CWP. One version was sent out with the 30-day notice, but it was amended pursuant to an <br />Executive Committee conference call prior to the meeting. That version was the vehicle for discussion. The <br />letter was further amended to clarify the CWP should be restored to its past 50%-50% federaVnon-federal <br />funding match. Further, language was added stating CWP funding should be a high USGS priority. Weir <br />Labatt moved and Sue seconded its adoption, which was approved. <br /> <br />A 3rd draft letter addressed to Senator Conrad Bums expressed the Council's concern over the <br />language in the House version of theFY 2006 Interior Appropriations Bill disapproving of USGS Water <br />Resources Division work that competes with commercial services provided by the private sector. The letter <br />states that the Council opposes any effort to force the privatization of CWP related USGS services. It was <br />discussed and a separate paragraph added recognizing USGS existing policy to avoid competition with the <br />private sector. The letter was moved by Duane Smith and seconded by Weir. It was approved. <br /> <br />One further note was that a liaison from NOAA should be assigned to attend Council meetings. <br /> <br />CL~TEUMPACTSANDSNOWPAC~SNO~LTDATA <br /> <br />Dr. Phil Mote with the University of Washington next addressed the Committee. He is working with <br />a consortium that includes the University of Colorado, Arizona and San Diego on a global climate variability <br />and water modeling. Global heat flow radiates infrared wavelengths [out going] and the Greenhouse Effect <br />is due to surface radiation greater than that from the sun. There is no doubt about heating from fossil fuel <br />burning (though there is some natural warming) with warming since the late 1890s due to human activity. <br />It is statistically significant in the West. Since 1950, we have experienced a 1.5 degree warming. The South <br />Cascade Glacier is receding, as is virtually every glacier in the West. <br /> <br />Our study of April 1 snow water equivalents show snow course measurements have declined at 75% <br />of the sites, with some declines of 70-80%. The largest declines in the Northwest and in California. There <br />is now less snow on April 1. <br /> <br />As a result, there are three key hydrologic changes that will impact water management. First, there <br />is a shift to earlier peak flows. Second, we will see increased winter flows and rainfall, and third, summer <br />flows will decrease. Evidence gathered by the University of California - San Diego shows these changes are <br />already taking place with larger March and lower June flows. Regarding earlier spring pulse dates, peak <br />flows coming 5-20 days earlier have been observed, consistent with climatic warming. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.