Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Western States Water Council <br />Water Resources Committee Minutes <br /> <br />Seattle, Washington <br />July 14, 2005 <br /> <br />has been flat since that time, and we are now "hemorrhaging in some states." The largest number of gages <br />lost are in eastern states and some U.S. Army Corps of Engineer districts. In total, some 830 long-term gages <br />have been lost (since 1933?). Growing attention is being focused on this issue. <br /> <br />Many Texas water districts came to the Hill [Congress] this past Spring - a little late - to ask for more <br />Coop spending. California got there in February. Congressman John Abney Culberson (R) of Houston, <br />Texas has a personal interest in geosciences and has weighed in, from his position on the House <br />Appropriations Committee, but it has had no impact yet. <br /> <br />There has also been an issue raised regarding USGS work and competition with the private sector. <br />USGS has had a policy for many years, so that "we don't step on their toes." However, we recognize it is <br />a gray issue. Our approach is not to take your money and contract with private sector, but split the job and <br />work in partnership with states. We have some excellent examples of this approach. However, the American <br />Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) got some language inserted in the House Interior Appropriations Bill <br />regarding the issue, but with no details regarding their concerns. It was strong language disapproving of <br />current job we are doing, but it was not a formal requirement for change. Some Interior/OMB folks think <br />CWP should be contracted out. We appreciated you letters of support for the current CWP, which combines <br />states' support USGS expertise and quality assurance and quality control (QAQC). We hope to see the <br />political privatization agenda rebutted, including at Interior. We hope there will be affirmative language in <br />the Interior conference report that says the states should be able to contract with USGS for work, and their <br />appears to be some movement that way. <br /> <br />Again, we are "deeply gratified by your support" and financial aid at the field level and national <br />budget level - and for your friendship as well. <br /> <br />Questions & Answers <br /> <br />Duane Smith: "Do our proposed letters address your concerns?" The letter doesn't mention USGS policies <br />and the possibility of splittingjobs. <br /> <br />Bob suggested that it should also be addressed to the Congress and Interior. He added, "We <br />appreciate Kansas being a partner for over 110 years." <br /> <br />Dave Pope observed that Kansas installed the first streamgage in 1895 first gage, and Bob was there <br />to commemorate the event in 1995. <br /> <br />Sue Lowry again laid out the WSWC strategy and pointed out that just maintaining level funding <br />means losing gages. We want to get back to a 50%-50% match. A Cooperators' Steering Group has had two <br />conference calls, with another scheduled in two or three weeks. We are seeking a common network of <br />support, and plan to send a letter to Secretary Norton in early August (a draft was included with the proposed <br />positions under Tab C). Thereafter, a letter will be prepared, hopefully with a longer list of signers, for March <br />hearings on Interiors FY 2007 budget request. Weare asking for a $1 OM/year increase incrementally. Peter <br />Evans, under contract with the Interstate Council on Water Policy (ICWP) is putting together a strategy and <br /> <br />5 <br />