My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00145 (2)
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00145 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:17:35 AM
Creation date
9/19/2007 3:57:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2005
Title
Western States Water Council - Seattle, WA., July 13-15, 2005
CWCB Section
Administration
Description
Western States Water Council - Seattle, WA., July 13-15, 2005
Publications - Doc Type
Water Policy
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
527
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Western States Water Council <br />Water Resources Committee Minutes <br /> <br />Boise, Idaho <br />April 21, 2005 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />We have a great opportunity with former Nebraska Governor Mike Johanns now the USDA <br />Secretary. He is letting his people work through it, and Jackhas met with them. <br /> <br />Jack recommended that the letter to Senator Domenici be approved by the committee. <br /> <br />Questions, Answers & Discussion <br /> <br />Jim Davenport: "What kind of activities would be funded?" <br /> <br />Jack responded it mainly provides for planning and watershed work to reduce risk. <br /> <br />Jim: " To respond to economic losses?" <br /> <br />Shaun McGrath said it is intended to operate like other emergencies, with a pot of money <br />available to plan for drought and then implement plans, without begging for supplemental <br />appropriation. It would also fund NIDIS. We are trying to get away from solely reacting to the <br />economic losses, and trying to proactively look at risk reduction. <br /> <br />Jack added that OMB is looking at ways to reduce emergency spending, with 10% of annual . <br />impacts suggested as an appropriate target for funding. <br /> <br />Shaun explained that $6-8 billion are now spent annually on drought mitigation. We would like <br />to be more proactive on the local or watershed level. Similarly, NIDIS would provide monitoring on a <br />local level, and information for decisionmaking, with triggers for action on pre-prepared plans to <br />address anticipated impacts. You would have money to take mitigative actions with the onset of <br />drought. <br /> <br />Jack asked, "How do you conserve and better manage water?" During drought, it is not much <br />different than what we talked about yesterday -water conservation. The bill would raise the priority' <br />of drought preparedness and better integrate and coordinate existing programs. <br /> <br />Tom Maddock: "$2 million doesn't seem like much." <br /> <br />Jack: "That is just for the Council and to implement the Act. The drought fund authorizing language <br />is "such sums as may be necessary." <br /> <br />Shaun: "Yes, you would have to ask for an annual appropriation." <br /> <br />Jack moved adoption of the letter. It was seconded by Larry Anderson, and unanimously <br />approved. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.