My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00145 (2)
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00145 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:17:35 AM
Creation date
9/19/2007 3:57:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2005
Title
Western States Water Council - Seattle, WA., July 13-15, 2005
CWCB Section
Administration
Description
Western States Water Council - Seattle, WA., July 13-15, 2005
Publications - Doc Type
Water Policy
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
527
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Western States Water Council <br />Full Council Minutes <br /> <br />Boise, Idaho <br />April 22, 2005 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />chance. The bill also deals with environmental flows, both in stream and for bays and estuaries, which <br />could be a major allocation of water. We are developing a methodology for determining the indirectly <br />effects of ground water pumping on stream flows. However, 90% of all ground water is under the <br />control of 90 ground water districts. There are some provisions of the bill that would change ground <br />water management. <br /> <br />Wyoming <br /> <br />Pat Tyrrell observed that there are three bills in their legislature that are supported by the State <br />Engineer. One would increase penalties up to $1 ,250/day and recodify the statutes related to <br />possession of stolen water for small reservoirs. It is Senate file 28 on the legislature's official website. <br />House Bill 1 wciuld remove roadblocks to online electronic applications. Another would remove a <br />requirement that the State Engineer maintain a water library. Coalbed methane <br />well applications keep coming. Our permit backlog has grown to 2,700 permits for a 2-3 year delay. <br />We have a supplemental budget request approved for $400,000 for three more positions, to contract for <br />dam inspections, and for overtime for staff (which has required with mandatory overtime of up to 50 <br />hours/week). We are designing a Weston IT system to be completed by 2007 or 2008 at an initial cost <br />of $1.4 million. With respect to the drought, the snow didn't get to Wyoming, but hit Utah and south . <br />central Colorado, New Mexico, etc. "The Bear River is the worst in Utah, but the best snow pack in <br />Wyoming!" We are looking at shortages with Nebraska on the Platte River and with Montana on the <br />Tongue River. <br /> <br />Montana <br /> <br />Jack Stults said that on Wednesday Governor Schweitzer signed HB 22 with fees to accelerate <br />their statewide adjudic,ation for 225,000 claims (required and filed since 1982). It has been funded <br />from General Fund appropriations, but would have taken another 37 years or more to complete. It is <br />now estimated they will finish in 10 years with another 49FTEs. The fee is $lO/year for 10 years on <br />all water rights, and will raise some $31 million to go into a special account. There are benchmarks <br />and two-year progress reports. It is an aggressive schedule, but we're comfortable. The fee will be <br />billed every two years, by our Department of Revenue. We do have an ownership data base that is <br />maintained, and we are very excited. The fee is capped off at $200/year/owner. There is a differing <br />fee structure, and some flat fees. It will cost about $86,000 for Department of Fish Wildlife and Parks' <br />instreamflows, but they support it. The bill passed our Appropriations Committee unanimously and the <br />House 98-1. We have a serious problem in management without adjudicated water rights. <br /> <br />Montana also has international boundary issues with Canada involving the St. Mary's River and <br />Milk River. There is a 1906 interbasin transfer to the Milk, and a 1909 treaty. An International Joint <br />Commission (IJC) order in 1921 implements the Boundary Waters Treaty. Montana complained that <br />the operating rule didn't match the Treaty in the 1930s. Montana claimed it wasn't getting its share of <br />the water. The IJC split then, but now the issue has come up again. We believe Canada gets a 70-30% <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.