Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Western States Water Council <br />Full Council Minutes <br /> <br />Boise, IdlJho <br />April 22, 2005 <br /> <br />produce a meaningful amount of water. Typically, if the call is futile, there is no injury. Here there is <br />injury, but the effects are delayed. <br /> <br />There are 1900 priorities for surface water for irrigation districts now making a call. They are <br />senior to all ground water rights. There is perhaps 2 Maf of pumping depletion. Say <br />hypothetically the injury amounts to 100,000 af. If you shut off all pumpers, you may get that 100,000 <br />ac ftthe first year, but eventually the 2 Maf also has an impact. Moreover, the Appropriation Doctrine <br />also includes the idea of maximum beneficial use. <br /> <br />In the "Schodde" case (which was a suit was over construction of Milner Dam), the river was <br />usually entirely diverted for irrigation. The dam flooded upstream water wheels used to lift water to <br />meet a senior right. The court found the senior was required to have a reasonable means of diversion, <br />and was not entitled to the entire resource (river flow to run water wheels). <br /> <br />In the Snake Plain, flow direction does not matter and flow lines are meaningless with respect <br />to decisions regarding a cone of depression. It creates a void that reverses ground water flow that <br />eventually interconnects with surface flows and spring discharges. We recognize that hydraulic <br />connection effects ground water flows, but you can't see and follow ground water. A <br />model is used for administration. Five years ago we got money for a ground water model for the <br />Eastern Snake Plain. The old model was calibrated to one year (1980), which was inadequate. We <br />spent $3 million - with other contributions from USGS, Idaho Power, and the U.S. Bureau of <br />Reclamation. <br /> <br />We now have "incremental collaborative decisionmaking." We have a technical team of <br />hydrologists vertical integrated - with people from the University of Idaho, Idaho Water Research <br />Institute (IWRI), Idaho Power, a canal company, and ground water users. They all helped develop the <br />model, and decisions are made by the group. It has forced them to work together, and over time <br />respect grew for the model as the best they could do. The model is calibrated to 1,000 wells and 22 <br />years with four snapshots of mass measurements. Everybody had to buy in, and now can't realistically <br />challenge the model. <br /> <br />Drought is alive and well in Idaho. I apologize for any misconceptions from the field trip. We <br />really have been very dry! The Upper Snake drought still is in the extreme or exceptional category. It <br />is not attributable to climate change. We have a collaborative relationship with the University of <br />Washington, and we are trying to integrate climate models with surface water runoff models, but we <br />are not there yet. We may in the future see more rain than snow, and more variability, and more <br />weather extremes. The ramifications for water supply and flood control are significant. The old Corps <br />project operation rules won't work in the future. It appears that less water will be stored as snow. <br /> <br />5 <br />