Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Western States Water Council <br />Water Re,sources Committee Minutes <br /> <br />Boise, Idaho <br />April 21, 2005 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />strategic plan for water use, removing barriers to water markets, and finding ways to work within <br />water law. <br /> <br />People mostly want good data. However, to change behavior, piling facts in front of people <br />isn't enough. He reviewed some of the steps taken since the September listening session. He <br />mentioned requests for funding applications (RFAs). He concluded adding that little-by-Iittle there is a <br />growing awareness of water quantity and the role USDA can play. <br /> <br />THE WALLA WALLA RIVER BASIN FEASIBILITY STUDY <br /> <br />Chris Hyland, Corps of Engineers Project Manager for the Walla Walla River Basin Feasibility <br />Study, accompanied by Gary James, representing the Umatilla Tribe in Pendleton, Oregon, described <br />the study as a good example of a collaborative effort, as opposed to some of the conflicts over water. <br />Background information on the study was included in the briefing books under Tab K. Chris noted <br />there has been a lot of conflict in the Methow ~nd Klamath basins. In the Walla Walla, we have the <br />tribes, fisheries people and others working together. It nearly came to a Klamath-type situation, but we <br />didn't want to go down that path. In the Umatilla, there have been no salmon runs for over 70 years, <br />and only limited steelhead runs. We are working with the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), but in the . <br />Walla Walla there was no BOR project. It is a basin within a reservation, with ceded areas and rights <br />to fish. <br /> <br />Using a power point presentation, Chris examined the farming and fishing issues, and <br />endangered species (spring chinook and bull trout). The Walla Walla study is a negotiation to protect <br />both agriculture and fish - a win-win situation, building on a Umatilla comprehensive restoration <br />strategy - instream flow, passage improvements, watershed protection, land purchases, and riparian <br />improvements. BPA will provide money for fish passage. Another option is dam removal. Along the <br />South Fork Touchet we are looking at purchasing of 8,700 acres over 10 miles of stream. We are also <br />planning a hatchery for 2008. With big returns in the Columbia, some have moved into the Walla, <br />Walla. Some 350 individuals returned in 2004, with 2005 smolts the first released. <br /> <br />There are flow problems and concerns with high temperatures, spawning and rearing areas, <br />etc. We are looking at flow enhancements and a Corp project sponsored by the tribe. We are working <br />with local irrigators through conservation efforts to provide 25 cfs to avoid ESA"take" with the U. S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). There are both near and long term efforts with flow targets. We <br />hope to reach 50-100 cfs for rearing and more for chinook and steelhead migration. Storage exchange <br />is another option. <br /> <br />Walla Walla means land with many waters. "I like [Walla Walla] onions on my salmon!" <br /> <br />This is a $5.9 feasibility study cost, with a 50% inkind tribal contribution. We are looking at <br />off-channel storage, exchanges, efficiency, building a dam off-channel for irrigation, and leaving water . <br />instream for fish. The Pine Creek site has possibilities, with 2-3 fish barriers downstream which have <br /> <br />8 <br />