Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Western States Water Council <br />Full Council Minutes <br /> <br />Washington, D.C. <br />March 29, 2006 <br /> <br />Phil Ward: "Will there be any new areas of emphasis under Secretary Kempthorne?" <br /> <br />Mark: "Not that I know of. I haven't talked to him yet. He will take the ball and run with it, in a <br />seamless fashion." I expect he will continue to support the 4Cs, and he will be similarly engaging and <br />personable. He may have new initiatives. <br /> <br />In conclusion, Mark said, "I really appreciate talking to you. We need to listen to you. Ifwe <br />work together, we can get a lot done." <br /> <br />REPORT FROM THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS <br /> <br />Steven L. Stockton, Deputy Director for Civil Works with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br />addressed the Council. Steve is a professional engineer and part ofthe Senior Executive Service (P.E., <br />SES). Steve explained he has worked 27 years in Portland and San Francisco. He also mentioned <br />federal budget constraints to addressing water problems. "Your work plan is impressive." The West is <br />approaching serious water problems. He had just returned from Mexico City and a conference on social <br />and economic stability. <br /> <br />We have lost sight of the importance of the past investments we have made in water, which now <br />provide a "stable platform for the rest of our economy to grow." Gross National Product and growth are <br />issues in countries that can't control their hydrograph - droughts and floods. We have lost our vision and <br />purpose in investment. This affects our "ability to sustain what we've got, but make new investments." <br />We need the infrastructure to handle drought and floods, and sustain navigation and ports. The federal <br />government doesn't have the resources to meet all our needs. We need partnerships, and local sponsors. <br />The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 was a defining piece oflegislation with its cost <br />sharing philosophy. Cost sharing eliminates egregious projects, and allows us to focus on larger <br />problems. <br /> <br />Steve mentioned the Corps Strategic Plan, which is designed to bring our resources to help you <br />solve problems on a watershed scale. The Corps has a large operation and maintenance (O&M) budget, <br />which is now more than 40% ofthe Corps budget. There is some reluctance to invest in new <br />infrastructure, when we struggle to maintain what we've got. Projects my age (or even John Keys' age) <br />begin to show wear and tear. <br /> <br />Our water needs keep changing. There is a backlog of authorized projects. Our population is <br />expanding into the Southwest, towards the South and coasts. As the population moves, the needs of the <br />Nation will change. There are more people into high hazard areas, and we need to plan for the future. <br /> <br />The American Society of Civil Enginneers (ASCE) review of infrastructure status and their <br />report card has been helpful, while increasing the visibility of chronic infrastructure problems. "We love <br />to come in and rescue people, but don't have the political will to invest in infrastructure to prevent <br />problems before they occur." With proper planning to sustain ourselves, we can avoid many problems. <br /> <br />5 <br />