My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00144 (2)
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00144 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:17:10 AM
Creation date
9/19/2007 3:43:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2006
Title
Western States Water Council - Breckenridge, CO., July 19-21, 2006
CWCB Section
Administration
Description
Western States Water Council - Breckenridge, CO., July 19-21, 2006
Publications - Doc Type
Water Policy
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
491
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Western States Water Council <br />Water Resources Committee Minutes <br /> <br />Washington, D.C. <br />March 28, 20061 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />About $4 million was recently carved out for that purpose. Our watershed proposals dovetail very well <br />with the Action Plan the WSWC is working on. <br /> <br />As a tri division proposal, the Corps put in for money to help advance the Action Plan of the <br />WSWC. The final scope can be modified to include the scope and tasks form the WSWC's report to the <br />Governors. Our proposal was submitted to HQ in February, and we are anticipating a decision any day. <br />We hope that we can help support the work for the WSWC Action Plan with planning and technical <br />assistance. <br /> <br />O&M budgets over the last many years have been flat lined. He listed additional programs. <br /> <br />In summary, the Corps has a vast array of water resources programs. We have a desire to <br />provide assistance, specifically for the WSWC Action Plan. <br /> <br />Questions and Answers <br /> <br />Weir: For most of the western states, the BOR is the big player. In our country, the Corps of Engineers <br />has been the big player. <br /> <br />Jack Stults: Do you have any speculation on WRDA passing? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Kevin: My understanding is that there has been a request to bring it back to the floor. <br /> <br />THE 2007 FARM BILL: USDA'S LISTENING <br /> <br />Mark Rey, USDA, Under Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment, gave a frank and <br />insightful assessment of Farm Bill programs and policies. <br /> <br />He said that the 2002 Farm Bill represented the strongest statement in favor of conservation of <br />our working farm lands and waters that Congress has ever enacted. It authorized $2 billion, and it will <br />expire in2007. Therefore, it is again before Congress. <br /> <br />We have a strong interest in building on the lessons learned from the 2002 bill, and are offering <br />suggestions in developing the 2007 bill. Secretary Johanns led a series of listening sessions about what <br />the new farm bill should include. He conducted 56 sessions in 48 of the 50 states. In the course, the <br />Secretary himself convened 40 sessions. Mr. Rey convened nine of the sessions. They have received <br />many comments. <br /> <br />Since the first of the year, they have been reviewing all of that information and distilling it. They <br />will be putting together a series of background papers that summarize the major issues that were raised as <br />broadly as possible. They will use the papers as a mechanism to determine what to propose to put in the <br />next farm bill. The Secretary has asked that they reduce the ideas in writing by summer. No final <br />decision has been made yet, but USDA hasn't undertaken this major effort to sit by and watch Congress . <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.