Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. Evaluate membrane treatment technologies in order to characterize their <br />residuals streams in terms of quality and quantity. <br />. Catalogue current membrane treatment technology facilities in Colorado and <br />describe their current treatment and disposal practices. <br />. Evaluate membrane residuals treatment and disposal options in terms of costs <br />and feasibility for different treatment capacities. <br />. Document and report on regulatory strategies utilized by other states with respect <br />to permitting membrane treatment facilities and their produced residuals. <br />. Evaluate the feasibility, cost, and environmental/public health protection <br />concerns associated with: 1) permitting discharges of brine to surface waters; 2) <br />beneficial reuse of water resources and dissolved solids recovered from <br />membrane water treatment waste streams; and 3) land disposal of residual solid <br />evaporates from brine waste streams. <br />. Propose a pilot program that includes a proposed regulatory framework to <br />address membrane water treatment and proper management of brine residuals <br />in a specified drainage area (e.g., one or more water body segments where there <br />are communities with existing and/or proposed membrane water treatment <br />systems). <br /> <br />A workgroup website is available at http://www.coloradowateroualitV.com/ro/index.htm. <br /> <br />3.0 Drivers of Membrane Treatment <br /> <br />Membrane treatment was first identified as a viable method for treating drinking water in <br />the 1960's. Over the years, membrane treatment plants have become more affordable <br />to construct and operate. Conversely, the cost of freshwater water supplies for <br />municipal use has increased sharply due to a dramatic decrease in available water <br />supplies. In the South Platte River Basin, as well as other parts of the state, public <br />drinking water utilities have become increasingly reliant on lower quality source waters <br />that typically require a greater degree of treatment than pristine sources. <br /> <br />Up until now, potential impacts associated with the use of RO/NF treatment have not <br />been fully evaluated. Water suppliers have routinely assumed that RO treatment <br />addresses issues surrounding the production of drinking water that meets public health <br />requirements but have overlooked the issue of brine concentrate disposal. This is <br />primarily an artifact of dealing with residuals from conventional processes. Historically, <br />conventional water treatment residuals have been easily addressed in a the design of a <br />treatment facility. <br /> <br />Conversely users of water and regulatory issues have not adequately addressed the <br />impact that activities such as urban growth, non-point source, agricultural return flows, <br />and increased use of reclaimed water have had on water supplies available for drinking <br />water use. Reducing nitrate, TDS, and other natural and man-made concentrations in <br />source waters represents a particularly difficult challenge for drinking water suppliers. <br />Circumstances as described above has resulted in a greater number of drinking water <br />utilities choosing to implement membrane treatment to address Safe Drinking Water Act <br />requirements and aesthetic issues resulting from lower quality source water supplies <br />(refer to Appendix B for information on current and proposed RO facilities in Colorado), <br /> <br />5 <br />