Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Water Supply Reserve Account - Grant Application Form <br />Form Revised May 2007 <br /> <br />2. Describe how the water activity meets these Threshold Criteria. <br /> <br />1. The water activity meets the eligibility requirements outlined in Part 2 of the Criteria and <br />Guidelines. <br />The water activity meets the eligibility requirements outline in Part 2 of the Criteria and Guideline. As a <br />private non-government organization, Ducks Unlimited is eligible to apply for the SB-179 grant funds. The <br />grant provided by SB~ 179 will be used to deliver capital construction projects of a structural nature by <br />purchasing materials and equipment, contracting construction work, etc. However, there will be a need to <br />conduct small survey and design studies to determine feasibility and pursue permits for environmental <br />compliance. Most projects outlined in the application are already approved for NEPA Section 7 through the <br />SPWRAP. However, Section 404 permits of the Clean Water Act will need to be attained. <br /> <br />2. The water activity is consistent with Section 37-75-102 eolorado Revised Statutes. <br />The requirements/language from the statute is provided in Part 3 of the Criteria and Guidelines. <br />This project shall conform to the requirements/language of the above Statute. Projects delivered with funds <br />provided as part ofthis application possess or will file for recharge rights according to the laws and statutes <br />of Colorado. Most rights have been filed. However, some filings are being engineered at this time. As <br />most project tracts, to be discussed later, are located within a few miles of the state border there appears to <br />be opportunity to file new water rights (2007) that will still be effective. In fact, at this time there are no <br />other direct diversions for recharge filed below the property boundary. <br /> <br />3. The water activity underwent an evaluation and approval process and was approved by the Basin <br />Roundtable (BRT) and the application includes a description of the results of the BRTs evaluation <br />and approval of the activity. At a minimum, the description must include the level of agreement <br />reached by the roundtable~ including any minority opinion(s) if there was not general agreement for <br />the activity. The description must also include reasons why general agreement was not reached (if it <br />was not), including who opposed the activity and why they opposed it. Note- If this information is <br />included in the letter from the roundtable chair simply reference that letter. <br />The Project was presented to the South Platte Roundtable on July 91h, 2007in a manner following all by- <br />laws and rules set by the roundtable. The South Platte Roundtable unanimously passed a motion of support <br />for the project. Bruce Gerk, Harold Evans and Joe Frank made positive and supporting comments in favor <br />of the agreement. A letter from the roundtable chairman will support this grant application <br /> <br />4. The water activity meets the provisions of Section 37-75-104(2), Colorado Revised Statutes. The <br />requirements/language from the statute is provided in Part 3 of the eriteria and Guidelines. <br />Given the status of many requirements under this threshold, the project proponent has exceeded most <br />expectations. Although many of the requirements outlined in this statute are being pursued by each <br />roundtable, none of them are complete. The Statewide Water Supply Initiative (SWSI) states that the counties <br />involved, Morgan, Logan, and Sedgwick will provide 8,900 acft of water toward the M&l gap. This will be <br />conducted specifically via wetland recharge projects. Additionally, the State is required to deliver 10,000 acft <br />for the PRRP, an additional gap that the SWSI neglected to account for, but must be met as part of the overall <br />gap in future water needs. This project will build significant capacity toward meeting those gaps. Ducks <br /> <br />6 <br />