My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Gunnison - Paonia Feldman Diversion Reconstruction Project (Part 2 - Construction)_Application
CWCB
>
WSRF Grant & Loan Information
>
Backfile
>
Gunnison - Paonia Feldman Diversion Reconstruction Project (Part 2 - Construction)_Application
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2013 6:38:20 PM
Creation date
9/13/2007 10:47:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
WSRA Grant and Loan Information
Basin Roundtable
Gunnison
Applicant
North Fork River Improvement Association
Description
Paonia-Feldman Diversion Reconstruction Project (Part 2 - Construction)
Account Source
Statewide
Board Meeting Date
9/19/2007
Contract/PO #
150411
WSRA - Doc Type
Grant Application
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Water Supply Reserve Account – Grant Application Form <br />Form Revised O ctober 2006 <br />_______________________________________ <br /> <br />In 2004, an unusually large volume of water entered the Feldman Ditch and washed it out, causing <br />several thousand dolla rs in damage to the ditch and adding a huge volume of silt and debris to the <br />river. Sediment and gravel losses from eroding bulldozed gravel dams are extremely high. This <br />translates into higher sediment loads in the river and loss of adequate elevation req uired to meet <br />the existing elevation of the ditch. The result is a vertical loss of riverbed and aquatic habitat <br />upstream as the down - cutting process migrates. <br /> <br />The two diversions are situated immediately upstream from a previous in - stream gravel mine. As a <br />result of gravel mining, extensive downcutting and headcutting has occurred immediately below the <br />current diversion points. This erosion of the river bed resulted in the need to move the diversion <br />point of the Paonia Ditch upstream in past years. As res ult of these moves, the two diversions are <br />nearly opposite one another on different sides of the river. <br /> <br />The magnitude of the downcutting is evidenced by the fact that between 1992 and 1997 the river <br />downcut 5 feet at the highway bridge located less than o ne - mile downstream of these diversions. <br />Since mining in the river ceased in 1998 the downcutting has stopped. <br /> <br />Headcutting upstream from the gravel pit has also been measured. At the point of diversion for the <br />Paonia Ditch, approximately 3,000 feet upst ream from the bridge, 30 inches of bank erosion and 24 <br />inches of channel degradation was recorded in one year in 1997. The rock diversion structure for <br />the Paonia Ditch may be slowing the advancement of further headcutting upstream but does exhibit <br />signs of damage from the river headcutting below. <br /> <br />In 1997, the N orth F ork R iver I mprovement A ssociation negotiated with the gravel company to <br />quit mining in the channel and work only in the floodplain. The work in the floodplain has since <br />been completed; it wa s reclaimed in March of 2004 and is now inactive. The gravel company has <br />generously donated 19 acres in and along both sides of the river for a community river park. <br /> <br />Further degradation of the riparian corridor, including the stream channel appears to be slowing <br />since the cessation of in - stream mining. However, it is very possible that the existing diversion, <br />which is acting as a grade control, could fail in a large runoff event. If this were to happen, the <br />headcut could progress further upstream. With out rehabilitation, the river will likely remain <br />braided with a very high width - to - depth ratio. Annual repairs to the diversion and the associated <br />disturbance to the channel bed are expected to continue in the future if this project is not <br />implemented . <br /> <br />T he uncontrolled and inefficient diversion of water at this site results in over - diverting flows which <br />often leaves the downstream reach in a dewatered condition and downstream users without water. <br />This is particularly common in later summer and early fall and during drought conditions. This <br />dewatering of the river leaves fish trapped in pools, usually leading to mortality as result of low <br />oxygen levels and lethal water temperatures. The push - up dam also prevents fish migration <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.