My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00146
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00146
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:17:48 AM
Creation date
9/7/2007 5:02:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2006
Title
Western States Water Council - Washington, DC., March 26-29, 2006
CWCB Section
Administration
Description
Western States Water Council - Washington, DC., March 26-29, 2006
Publications - Doc Type
Water Policy
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Western States Water Council <br />Water Resources Committee Minutes <br /> <br />San Antonio, Texas <br />October 20, 2005 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />At present, 13 of 14 proposed power plants are looking at hybrid or dry cooling, which has <br />implications for efficient, heat rate and emissions. Hydropower availability and water use are issues. <br />There is increasing competition for resources. <br /> <br />Commissioner Geesman, an investment banker, next addressed the group. He sits on both <br />"renewables" and "facility siting" committees. He described integrated energy planning strategies. <br />California had an active role in the 1970s, but following the mid-199Qs deregulation era, abandoned <br />energy planning entirely. Then came the 2001 meltdown. I came to the Commission in 2002. The <br />inescapable message is: "We don't have a handle on electrical needs of our water system. Water <br />supply and demand balancing is difficult, and is divorced from electricity planning. Water <br />development, transportation, treatment and reuse account for about 20-25 % of power demands in <br />California. We now invest more effort in electricity forecasting for the future, but it is alarming that <br />we don't know more about the water side. Further, 32% of our natural gas goes to water uses. <br /> <br />We need to assist water districts and encourage them to provide their own generation. <br />Each generator is now treated that same as a power company. Like individual generators, let districts <br />generate and get credit for power. The same goes for sewage treatment, but there are <br />legal and policy obstacles to future generation. FERC hydropower licensing and future relicensing, . <br />with modern retrofits to get more power, is another area of concern. <br /> <br />We can make better use of water storage, and there are some political opportunities. Also, <br />California wants to shift more ofload to renewables. We have aggressive goals - 20% by 2010, and <br />30% by 2020. But renewables best serve us in winter and at night, not on summer afternoons. The <br />value of electricity at night is below 1 cent or less per kilowatt hour. Power companies with nuclear <br />plants essential might pay you to use electricity at night. Water wholesalers and retailers might use this <br />opportunity. Many irrigation districts are already on "time of use" rates. However, for the most part, <br />energy efficiency and water conservation programs are disconnected. <br /> <br />Investors have spent $2 billion through 2008 to gear up energy/water conservation efforts. <br />There has been some progress with natural gas savings and hot water, but utilities can't fund cold water <br />savings now. California's water use is mostly urban, and there is an enormous pumping power load. <br />We lean hard on agriculture for water savings, while raising electric load (while reducing diesel use to <br />improve air quality). We need to better integrate energy and water conservation opportunities. <br /> <br />Questions and Answers <br /> <br />Weir Labatt: "Is someone from the Governor's side working on this? What about the California <br />Department of Water Resources?" <br /> <br />Geesman: NREL and the Western Governors' Association (WGA) want to promote dialogue. <br />DWR is underfunded in this area. There is little coordination in most states. It's true that California is . <br />looking at this more because of its problems with electricity and water demands. <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.