My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00145
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
PUB00145
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:17:24 AM
Creation date
9/6/2007 2:29:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2007
Title
Western States Water Council - Sioux Falls, SD., May 2-4, 2007
CWCB Section
Administration
Description
Western States Water Council - Sioux Falls, SD., May 2-4, 2007
Publications - Doc Type
Water Policy
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
595
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Western States Water Council <br />Water Resources Committee Minutes <br /> <br />Sheridan, Wyoming <br />October 5, 2006 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Oklahoma <br /> <br />Duane Smith reported that Oklahoma has about $13 million to update the state water plan. He <br />specifically noted that Texas and New Mexico received federal money appropriated directly to help them fund <br />their water planning efforts. <br /> <br />The Corps is trying to authorize ways in which they can enter the water planning arena. I certainly <br />believe that we want the states to have the lead role in state water planning, but there may be something in <br />the report we pull together that would identify federal partnerships in how to accomplish state planning <br />efforts. <br /> <br />Nevada <br /> <br />Nevada began planning efforts in the mid-1970s, according to Roland Westergard. Some of the <br />information may be outdated. There were general policy directions established in the plan for alternatives <br />for future development, and many of these still apply. About ten years ago, the state legislature established <br />a concerted state water planning effort and the process was pursued. A plan was developed and presented <br />to the legislature for approval or adoption. The legislature found it controversial enough that they would not <br />approve the state water plan, but would accept it. <br /> <br />Arizona <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Herb Guenther noted that there have been many plans prepared which are updated regularly, and the <br />information should be readily available. Tom Carr would be the contact. <br /> <br />Idaho <br /> <br />Norm Semanko commented that in Idaho, in the 1960s, they adopted a constitutional amendment that <br />set up a separate entity, the Idaho Water Resources Board, which was charged with developing a <br />comprehensive plan for the appropriation of the unappropriated water in Idaho. They have developed a <br />comprehensive plan which is updated regularly. The requirements in the statute have changed slightly over <br />time, but it covers all of the river basins. The last few years the focus has been on the Boise area and Treasure <br />Valley, in terms of population trends. Hal Anderson is likely the fellow to contact in this regard. The Bureau <br />of Reclamation just completed a study of potential storage opportunities in the Boise and Payette basins, <br />which includes many of the figures from IDWR studies and other studies. <br /> <br />After hearing the reports from each state with respect to their state planning efforts, it was determined <br />that Tony will send an email asking for information on individual state water plans, as well as a contact for <br />each state. Before asking for the information, WSWC staff will put together a format for collecting th'e data. <br />The Corps will also assist in putting together a format document for collecting this information. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.