Laserfiche WebLink
<br />table format, and includes the date, type of event, location, damages, other information, <br />and data source for each listing. Blank boxes within the table indicate that the particular <br />information was not available. <br /> <br />Total Values at Risk from Hazards <br />These figures were obtained from each county's Assessors office - a participant of each <br />County Planning Subcommittee (CPS). The figures are included because many of the <br />hazards present an equal risk across the entire county. It is unlikely, and unexpected, that <br />a natural hazard would destroy the total value of property within a county. However, <br />because the CPS cannot determine where a hazard will strike in the county, and which <br />property/infrastructure or what percent of property/infrastructure will be impacted, listing <br />the total value of the property/infrastructure at risk was deemed the most reasonable <br />approach of detailing "what is at risk." In most cases assessed values were listed, due to <br />the format of the available data. Floods are the only hazard addressed in this plan <br />where the CPS can determine where they will strike, what will be impacted, and a <br />reasonable estimate of the value of the damage. This is why each NFIP participating <br />community conducted a detailed floodplain inventory. <br /> <br />Floodplain InventoryNulnerability and Associated NFIP Data <br />NFIP Mapping Information <br />Listed are the names of all incorporated communities within each county, and the current <br />status of mapping within the NFIP. If the community has been mapped, the Community <br />Map # and the Effective Date is cited. <br /> <br />Inventory: In communities with NFIP maps, the CPS counted every residential, <br />commercial, and manufactured building within the identified Special Flood Hazard Area <br />(SFHA). In most cases a CPS team member, accompanied by a Certified Floodplain <br />Manager (CFM), did this manually. In some instances, CADD or GIS maps showing lots <br />and building footprints were utilized. In other cases, communities could provide a listing <br />of properties within the SFHA In Sterling/Atwood (Logan County), figures from <br />engineering studies for proposed mitigation projects were utilized. <br /> <br />The addresses of each building were then taken to the County Assessor's office where the <br />individual property cards were pulled and the values of the improved structures were <br />recorded. In a few counties, the Assessor's office was able to produce a digital listing of <br />the properties and their values. The individual values were then totaled to arrive at a total <br />value of property at risk. Actual values were listed. The actual values were utilized <br />because they provide a more accurate picture of what it would cost to repair or replace <br />the damaged properties. The actual values were calculated by "adding back in" the % <br />deducted in calculating "assessed values." In Colorado in 2001, residential property was <br />assessed at 9.15%. All commercial property is assessed at 29%. Only Real Property and <br />Improvement values were used. Land values were not included in the calculations, <br />because land is uninsurable, and generally not damaged, in floods. <br /> <br />Finally, using NFIP depth-damage curves from FEMA's Riverine Flood Benefit-Cost <br />software program, an average % of damage was calculated. This was done because <br /> <br />49 <br />