Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />m <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Lower Big Dry <:preek Hydrologic Study <br /> <br /> <br />. Palhegyi, Mangarella, Strecker, BicJell and Sen (2004): controlling the amount of post, <br />I <br />development "work" done on the stream. <br /> <br />Other general themes present in adVanCld stormwaler management programs are also <br />summarized. <br /> <br />7.3.1 DesiqninQ Stormwater Facilities to Better Match Flow FreQuencv Curve <br /> <br />In 2004, Nehrke and Roesner published theirl findings related to the effectiveness of the state-of, <br />practice for urban storm runoff control. They began with the widely used concept of peak flow <br />attenuation (i.e., reducing the peaks of posLdevelopment flows to predevelopment peak flow <br />levels) for given return interval storms. The~ noted that in most cases, flow controls target low <br />frequency events (storms equal to or 1argdr than the 2-year event); but not smaller, higher <br />frequency events. They noted that the more recent emphasis on removal of pollutants in urban <br /> <br />runoff has targeted control of high frequency rvents (smaller than the 2-year storm). <br /> <br />From this starting point, Nehrke and Roesner examined how well post-development flow <br />controls performed using various combiJations of design events compared to the pre- <br />development flow regime. Performance wls judged on how well the post-development flow <br />frequency curve matched the pre-developme~t curve. Continuous simulation, using 50 years of <br />hourly rainfall records, was performed on a iite in Atlanta and a site in Fort Collins. Detention <br />I <br />ponds with a variety of orifices sized for ~eak flow control using traditional and innovative <br />methods were examined alone and in conAll1ction with extended detention best management <br />practices (BMPs) for water quality. I <br />I <br />Roesner and Nehrke found that the water q~ality BMP exerted at least some flow control in a <br />I <br />majority of storm events at both sites. Everi greater effectiveness was observed when the BMP <br />was paired with orifices designed to control ~he 1- or 2-year storm. More specifically, as shown <br />in Figure 9 for Fort Collins, when the BMP las combined with the 100/2-year peak flow control, <br />it performed better than the 100/10/2-year or1100/10/BMP systems for controlling events smaller <br />I <br />than the 2-year flow, but for events betwebn the 2-year and 4-year storm, the 100/10/2-year <br />I <br />combination provided significantly better control. Going a step further, adding a fourth orifice to <br />the flow control structure allowed for more domp1ete control of the flow frequency curve, which <br />I <br />Wright wrr Engineers, Inc. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />971-179.092 <br />June 2005 <br /> <br />Page 57 <br />