Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />m <br />I <br />- <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Lower Big Dry cpreek Hydrologic Study <br /> <br /> <br />continue to be modeled after UDFCD's utban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual. UDFCD <br />serves 39 Colorado towns, cities and counties in the Metro Denver area including Adams <br />County, Arapahoe County, Boulder County, City & County of Broomfield, City & County of <br />Denver, Douglas County, Jefferson County and the cities of Arvada, Aurora, Boulder, Bow Mar, <br />Brighton, Centennial, Cherry Hills Village! Columbine Valley, Commerc~ City, Edgewater, <br />Englewood, Erie, Federal Heights, Foxfield, Glendale, Golden, Qreenwood Village, Lafayette, <br />Lakeside, Lakewood, Littleton, Lone Tree, Louisville, Morrison, Mountain View, Northglenn, <br />I <br />Parker, Sheridan, Superior, Thornton, Westminster and Wheat Ridge. <br /> <br />In keeping with UDFCD's policies, most Jf these entities require detention for tbe IOO-year <br />event, and most "home-rule" cities also have la policy to detain the minor storm event, which may <br />I <br />vary from the 2-, 5- or 10-year event. Additionally, over the last 5-10 years or so, communities <br />regulated under the Phase I or Phase II stdrmwater regulations also now typically require or <br />encourage detention of the water quality capture volume (WQCV), which controls more <br />frequently occurring events (Personal communication with John Doerfer, UDFCD). Smaller <br />I <br />urban areas (>10,000 and <1 00,000 people) have begun to require detention or treatment of the <br />WQCV over the last several years. Thus, mbst of the urbanized areas in the metro Denver area <br />I <br />now provide detention for about three desib events. Other UDFCD policies were previously <br />described in Section 5.1. I <br /> <br />7.1.2 Enqineerina Manuals of Practice Jnd Texts <br /> <br />Use of detention facilities to control peak flows associated with urbanization is a common <br />practice recommended and discussed in virtually all engineering texts and manuals of praetice. <br />Several of these references were revieted with regard to design considerations and <br />recommendations for detention facilities, with a few examples of findings provided below. <br />I <br />. In Municipal Storm Water Management, Debo and Reese (2003) discuss stormwater <br />ordinances and regulations, including the fact that many local governments require on-site <br /> <br />detention to reduce downstream run0ff peaks. Additionally, they note that some states <br />have passed laws related to stormwatbr management to "assure that the maximum rate of <br />storm water runoff is not greater aft~r development than prior to the development" and <br />I <br /> <br />Wright Water Engineers, Inc. <br />I <br /> <br />971-179.092 <br />June 2005 <br /> <br />Page 50 <br />