My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10420
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10420
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:15:26 AM
Creation date
8/16/2007 10:57:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Adams
Broomfield
Weld
Community
Broomfield, Westminster and Thornton
Stream Name
Lower Big Dry Creek
Title
Lower Big Dry Creek Hydrology Study
Date
6/1/2005
Prepared For
Big Dry Creek Watershed Association
Prepared By
Wright Water Engineers, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />II <br />II <br />11 <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />:1 <br />il <br />11 <br />II <br />II <br /> <br />Lower Big Dry Creek Hydrologic Study <br /> <br />meander patterns. Bank erosion, as evidenced by exposed sediment, was present <br />on the almost vertical banks that are typical of outside bends in a meandering <br />channel. This condition prevails throughout the creek. As sediment is eroded in <br />the upstream portion of the creek, erosive potential is actually reduced in the <br />downstream portion of the creek as the eroded bank sediment is carried in <br />suspension, thereby reducing the tractive forces of the flowing water and <br />subsequent bank line erosion. <br /> <br />. Although erosion of the bare stream banks appears to be a dramatic loss of <br />topsoil, the erosion of most bank .lines actually appeared to be minor. In <br />particular, the ?latural erosion process within open space areas did not appear to <br />be excessive. There were, however, a few cases of more accelerated rates of <br />erosion either caused by fallen trees or by movement of rip rap, which had <br />originally been placed along the bank, into the active stream. <br /> <br />. Extent of bank erosion was estimated based on review of an aerial video and is <br />summarized in {Table 3] below. The overview indicates that at a macro-level, <br />Big Dry Creek is experiencing relatively low rates of erosion, as evidenced by <br />roughly 80 percent of the banks being vegetated. Of the remaining 20 percent of <br />banks that are denuded to some extent, 13 percent show low erosion potential, 6 <br />percent show moderate erosion potential and only 1 percent show heavy erosion <br />potential. It should be noted that most of the areas showing heavy erosion <br />potential are concentrated in the area between Highway 36 and Sheridan, where <br />the steep cut banks are located. Review of aerial photos and geologic data in this <br />area indicate that these banks are actually relatively stable, even though they are <br />steep and unvegetated. <br /> <br />971-179.092 <br />June 2005 <br /> <br />Wright Water Engineers, Inc. <br /> <br />Page 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.