My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10420
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10420
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:15:26 AM
Creation date
8/16/2007 10:57:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Adams
Broomfield
Weld
Community
Broomfield, Westminster and Thornton
Stream Name
Lower Big Dry Creek
Title
Lower Big Dry Creek Hydrology Study
Date
6/1/2005
Prepared For
Big Dry Creek Watershed Association
Prepared By
Wright Water Engineers, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Lower Big Dry Creek Hydrologic Study <br /> <br />6. Given the downstream complaints about high water and flooding, local governments in <br />the urbanizing areas should consider use of existing provisions in their drainage criteria to <br />require stricter stormwater management in areas with known drainage problems. In many <br />cases, this would mean more rigorous implementation of principles already in the <br />UDFCD's Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual and adopted by the cities. Examples <br />of the types of existing provisions that could be emphasized include: <br /> <br />a. Require that developers mmlmlze directly connected impervious area to the <br />maximum extent practicable and implement other "low impact development" <br />techniques such as porous landscape detention, grass lined swales, porous pavement <br />and other te:chniques that promote infiltration of runoff, particularly for frequently <br />occurring storms. Because of maintenance issues and limited benefits of underground <br />detention relative to other stormwater management strategies, underground detention <br />should be discouraged and used only as a last resort. <br /> <br />b. Require that developers evaluate and consider the downstream impact of their <br />development and implement appropriate stream stabilization techniques. <br /> <br />c. Strongly consider requiring outlet structures in new detention facilities that more <br />closely approximate the pre-development flow-frequency curve based on the concepts <br />developed by Nehrke and Roesner (2004) and Wulliman and Urbonas (2005). <br /> <br />7. From an engineering and regional perspective, the BDCW A should aggressively support <br />regional open space planning along Big Dry Creek in the near-term because of the current <br />rapid pace of development. The City of Thornton Open Space Master Plan has targeted <br />the Big Dry Cn;:ek floodplain in Adams County for high-priority land acquisition. Open <br />space taxes in Adams County and Thornton provide a realistic funding mechanism for <br />open space acquisition. Many options exist for landowners to remain on their property <br />and dedicate easements through a variety of tools described in the City of Thornton Open <br />Space Master Plan. Aside from engineering issues, however, it should be noted that <br />complex social, economic and cultural issues must be taken into account when <br />considering private property acquisition. In the event that conservation easements or <br /> <br />971-179.092 <br />June 2005 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />Wright Water Engineers, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.