Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Section 7 <br />Availability of Existing Water Supplies in the Arkansas Basin <br />IJIII <br /> <br />independent of the Prior Appropriation System. Permits <br />limit annual usage to depleting a certain percentage of <br />the computed aquifer volume, usually 1 percent. <br /> <br />In many cases the groundwater supplies are limited <br />either by their physical or legal availability. The physical <br />availability is the amount of water an aquifer can <br />produce. The legal availability is the amount of <br />groundwater that can be extracted from an aquifer under <br />the water rig hts system that is present for the specific <br />groundwater basin. <br /> <br />The amount of groundwater that each of these aquifers <br />can produce is difficult to determine. This is due to <br />several factors including uncertainty about the <br />transmissivity, porosity, thickness of an aquifer, its <br />extent, and locally, the effects of pumping that draws <br />down the groundwater supply. <br /> <br />The transmissivity of an aquifer describes its potential to <br />provide water. An aquifer with high transmissivity can <br />provide a large amount of water per foot of aquifer <br />drawdown. Transmissivity is a product of the aquifer <br />saturated thickness and its water-bearing properties. <br />Both of these aspects vary naturally throughout an <br />aquifer. The aquifer saturated thickness and the extent of <br />an aquifer usually are estimated based on a review of <br />driller's logs of the subsurface and mapping of the <br />permeable aquifer zones. An aquifer is composed mostly <br />of soil or rock particles, with the groundwater existing in <br />the porous void spaces in between. Soil and rock strata <br />of both aquifer and non-aquifer materials change in <br />composition due to how the strata were deposited, so the <br />void spaces also vary. The water-bearing properties of <br />an aquifer, defined as its hydraulic conductivity, are <br />related to the size, number, and interconnectedness of <br />the void spaces. It can vary by several orders of <br />magnitude due to natural variations in the aquifer <br />materials. Estimates of hydraulic conductivity can be <br />made from the aquifer grain size and from aquifer <br />pumping tests. The natural variation in porosity affects <br />the ability to accurately estimate the amount of <br />groundwater in storage in an aquifer. The range in <br />porosity also can be up to several orders of magnitude <br />for consolidated bedrock deposits and by a factor of 2 or <br />3 and for unconsolidated deposits. Due to the natural <br />variations of these aquifer properties, any estimates of <br />the amount of groundwater in storage and its availability <br />will have a larger amount of uncertainty associated with <br />them than will estimates of surface water availability. <br /> <br />CDIVI <br /> <br />7-2 <br /> <br />The groundwater resources in each basin have been <br />characterized based on published reports and data for <br />the major aquifer systems. <br /> <br />7.2.2 Denver Basin Bedrock Aquifers <br /> <br />The Denver Basin contains four major aquifer units. <br />These cover an area of approximately 6,700 square <br />miles extending from Greeley south to Colorado Springs <br />and from Limon west to the edge of the foothills. The <br />aquifers consist of layers of sedimentary rocks that are, <br />from youngest to oldest, the Dawson, Denver, Arapahoe, <br />and Laramie-Fox Hills. Figure 7-2 shows a cross-section <br />of the aquifer through the center of the basin. <br /> <br />There have been several estimates of the available water <br />in storage. One of the early estimates of water availability <br />was from the USGS (Robson 1987). In this study, <br />information from driller's logs, laboratory tests of core <br />samples, aquifer pumping tests, water level <br />measurements, and groundwater flow modeling were <br />used to delineate the configuration and storage <br />coefficients of each aquifer, from which estimates of the <br />available volume were made. The USGS study <br />concluded that approximately 467 million AF of water <br />existed in the Denver Basin aquifers, and of this <br />approximately 269 million AF of water could be <br />recovered. In 1985 the Colorado General Assembly <br />promulgated Senate Bill 5, which set forth criteria for <br />management of these bedrock aquifers. As part of this <br />Bill, the storage coefficient was determined for each <br />aquifer. The total amount of recoverable groundwater <br />was estimated to be 295 million AF. <br /> <br />The aquifer storage coefficient has a strong influence on <br />the estimated volume of water contained in an aquifer. <br />Detailed studies conducted on core samples from a <br />borehole located in the center of the basin near Kiowa <br />(Lapey 2003) indicated that the storage coefficient might <br />be as much as 30 percent lower than previously thought. <br />This translates into a possible 30 percent reduction in the <br />amount of recoverable water in storage, to approximately <br />206 million AF. <br /> <br />Even the lower estimates of the amount of available <br />water in storage in the Denver Basin aquifers are quite <br />large. Unfortunately, the sediments that make up each of <br />the aquifers tend to be relatively fine grained and include <br />many interlayered clay and shale units that have very low <br />permeability. As a result, the water-bearing ability of the <br /> <br />O:\SHAWN\ARKANSAS\S7 _ARKANSAS.DOC <br />