Laserfiche WebLink
<br />IV, Opportunities to Improve Agricultural Efficiency for Water Supply <br /> <br />Limited progress was made on agricultural water efficiency by the SWSI Phase 2 Conservation and Efficiency TRT and this <br />remains a significant challenge, Based on initial work, there appears to be some opportunities to achieve additional <br />efficiencies in agricultural water use However, since agricultural return flows are used by downstream water users, at a <br />watershed level there are significant limitations in the overall net potential savings that can be realized, Nevertheless, since <br />agricultural water use accounts for over 85 percent of total water use in the state, follow-up efforts should include this group <br />of water users CWCB and Colorado State University are working with the agricultural community to further examine these <br />issues and opportunities, <br /> <br />V. Alternative Agricultural Water Transfer Methods for Water Supply <br /> <br />SWSI Phase 2 provided an extensive look at all alternatives to a traditional transfer and concluded that fallowing has the <br />most potential statewide, and may require state assistance, Interruptible supply strategies will also be assessed. There may <br />be a role for the state, through the CWCB for example, to "level the playing field" through the use of incentives to encourage <br />M&I providers and users to use alternatives to traditional agricultural transfers in order to foster the maximum utilization of <br />the state's waters and to ensure that other non-market values (open space, wildlife habitat) are retained. <br /> <br />VI. Assessing the Effects of Climate Variability on Colorado's Consumptive Use Needs <br /> <br />Global warming is expected to alter the pattern of water supply and use in Colorado and should be factored into any long- <br />range planning Global warming-based changes to supply availability can be examined by comparing projected changes in <br />streamflow to current hydrographs at locations throughout the State, and estimating evaporative loss to reservoirs, The <br />change in consumptive water demands in Colorado will be evaluated using the CWCB's consumptive use model StateCU, <br /> <br />VII. Non-tributary Groundwater and Water Use Sustainability <br /> <br />Increasing demand for Colorado's limited water supplies suggests the need to examination of how our water resources can <br />be used more efficiently, One method to maximize beneficial use is to use surface and groundwater resources in a more <br />fully integrated manner through conjunctive use management This is a proven strategy that recharges aquifers during wet <br />periods and relies on them during dry periods, Studies conducted by the CWCB and Colorado Geological Survey have <br />shown that considerable storage exists in both alluvial and bedrock aquifers throughout the State, <br /> <br />VIII. Recalculate the Gap <br /> <br />The current Gap identified In SWSI is 118,200 AF based on the ability of the IPPs to address new demands An update to <br />the IPPs and the new demand projections out to 2050 will be used to recalculate for each basin, Additional considerations of <br />climate variability and groundwater sustainability will also be considered in recalculating the Gap, Climate variability will play <br />a role in determining the revised Gap and is described in detail below In the South Metro area it is also anticipated that <br />aquifer production will decline by 40 to 80 percent by the year 2050, and that municipal well production will decline, <br />Conjunctive use of available surface water supplies can reduce these costs and decrease the annual demand on the <br />aquifers by 50 percent <br /> <br />PRELIMINARY DRAFT <br /> <br />3 <br />