Laserfiche WebLink
<br />P. Fritz Holleman, Esq. <br />January 25, 2006 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />I understand that if accepted, the water right would be used by the CWCB for instream flow <br />purposes. The water right could be changed firstly to instream flow uses on Hat Creek. Most of the <br />return flows accrue to East Brush Creek so the historical depletion to Hat Creek is equal to the <br />diversion rate, 2.0 cfs. <br /> <br />Secondly the historical stream depletion rates or the historical consumptive use amounts <br />could be assigned to East Brush Creek and Brush Creek and the amounts passed downstream. <br />The following depletion rates are taken from row 15 of Table 2 and the historical consumptive use <br />rates are derived from the monthly volumes shown in row 7 of Table 2. <br /> <br />Month <br />May <br />June <br />July <br />August <br />September <br />October <br />November <br /> <br />Depletion lcfs) <br />0.04 <br />0.31 <br />0.17 <br />0.07 <br />0.05 <br />-0.03 <br />-0.02 <br /> <br />Historical Consumptive Use lcfs) <br />0.09 <br />0.16 <br />0.13 <br />0.10 <br />0.09 <br />0.12 <br />0.00 <br /> <br />If reductions in the historical consumptive use are necessary due to non use in 16 years of the <br />study period the depletion and historical consumptive use rates would be 41 percent less than the <br />monthly values shown above. The Division Engineer may be compelled to charge transit loss <br />against the monthly rates in amounts depending on how far downstream the CWCB transports the <br />water. <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />1. The Hat Creek Ditch diverted water for irrigation purposes from Hat Creek, a tributary of <br />East Brush Creek, Brush Creek, and the Eagle River. Its water right for 2.0 cfs with an <br />appropriation date of March 6, 1914 was decreed in Civil Action No. 673 by the Eagle <br />County District Court on July 17,1916. <br /> <br />2. For 1951 through 2004, the diversion records show water diverted in 23 years, no water <br />diverted in 16 years, and no information available in 15 years. For the 23 years with <br />records, the diversions averaged 230 acre-feet annually and ranged from 55 acre-feet in <br />1992 to 566 acre-feet in 1984. With inclusion of the 16 years showing no diversions, the <br />average decreases to 136 acre-feet annually. <br /> <br />3. The irrigated acreage is 22 acres or less based on inspection of an aerial photograph. <br />Field inspections would be needed to better identify the irrigated acreage and configuration <br />of the irrigation system. <br /> <br />4. A water budget shows that there was a full water supply available to the Hat Creek Ditch. <br />Using the diversion amounts for those years with diversions, 23 years, the historical <br />consumptive use averaged 35.4 acre-feet annually. The stream depletions, diversions <br />minus return flows, varied monthly during the irrigation season from 0.04 cfs in May to 0.31 <br />cfs in June. In October and November, return flows exceed diversions so there is a net <br />accretion of 0.03 cfs and 0.02 cfs, respectively. The lag is caused by the factors used to <br />delay the ground water return flows. If years of non-use must be considered, the historical <br />consumptive use and stream depletions would have to be reduced by 41 percent. <br />