My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
17
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:36:02 PM
Creation date
8/8/2007 4:17:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/11/2007
Description
WSP Section - Intrastate Water Planning - Oil Shale Water Use
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br />~ ii <br />Ii <br />:1 <br /> <br />42 Oil Shale Development in the United States: Prospects and Policy Issues <br /> <br />of salts and other minerals once extraction operations are terminated and ground- <br />water is allowed to reenter the site and contact the spent shale. <br />Opportunities for Action. While it appears highly unlikely that water quality <br />risk is a "show-stopper" problem, there is a critical need to obtain better information <br />on the nature and'long-term environmental fate of leachate from spent shale and the <br />water quality impacts of in-situ retorting. For spe:nt shale produced by surface <br />retorting, research is required to determine whether recent methods used to reclaim <br />spent shale piles are applicable to the amount of spent shale anticipated from <br />commercial-size retorting plants. Accordingly, once one or more firms announce <br />plans to go forward with initial commercial-scale surface retorting, a comprehensive <br />spent-shale assessment program, including mathematical modeling, laboratory tests, <br />and field monitoring, should be developed and implemented so that the issue of <br />spent shale management can be resolved before the production growth phase begins. <br />For in-situ retorting, confident prediction of the: transport and fate of salts and <br />other substances will only be resolved through extensive mathematical modeling of <br />the subsurface environment combined with comprehensive hydrological monitoring. <br />This research agenda should commence at the nexlt level of scale-up (i.e., at the <br />roughly 1,000 barrel per day demonstration operation). Otherwise, sufficient data <br />will not be available to inform decisions about whether to proceed with initial com- <br />mercial operations. <br />In both cases, a full understanding of risks and appropriate mitigation and con- <br />trol measures will probably not be available within six to eight years after a research <br />program commences. Consequently, only a partial knowledge base may be available <br />when industry decisionmakers are ready to build the initial round of commercial <br />plants. This information shortfall provides an impetus to taking a measured approach <br />to commercial oil shale development, as opposed to simultaneous permitting of <br />numerous first-generation commercial operations. <br />Finally, to ensure that the above water quality research and assessment programs <br />(as well as research agendas focused on land use and ecosystems and on air quality) <br />are properly formulated and to foster public confidence in the process and eventual <br />findings, consideration should be given to establishing an independent scientific <br />advisory and oversight board and public engagement strategy. <br /> <br />Socioeconomic Impacts <br />Challenges. The oil shale-bearing lands and the surrounding regions currently <br />are sparsely populated, with an average of only seven inhabitants per square mile.H <br />Large-scale oil shale development will stimulate a significant increase in the popula- <br /> <br />R According to rhe U.S. Census Bureau, rhe popularions of rhe rwo counties containing rhe Piceance and Uinta <br />Basins-Rio Blanco County. Colorado. and Uintah County. Urah-were 5,986 and 25,224, respectively, in <br />2000 (U.S. Census Bureau. Colorado. 2003; Utah, 2003). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.