Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:1 <br />" !: <br />:1 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />40 Oil Shale Development in the United States: Prospects and Policy Issues <br /> <br />first-served, BACT-based permitting process may become lengthy and highly conten- <br />tious, and this could result in a less competitive and extremely small oil shale indus- <br />try. <br />For air quality permits, consideration should be given to developing an alterna- <br />tive approach in which emission limits for initial plants are established so that future <br />production growth can occur within the allowable PSD Class II and Class I incre- <br />ments. Advances in regional air quality modeling malke feasible multiple case studies <br />involving alternative geographic locations and hypothetical emission levels. If timed <br />to yield early results, regional air quality modeling will also serve as useful input to <br />work on a Programmatic EIS conducted to inform government decisions regarding <br />the environmental impacts of alternative strategies for leasing public lands. <br /> <br />Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />Challenges. Heating oil shale for retorting, whether aboveground or in situ, <br />requires significant energy inputs. Over at least the next few decades, this energy will <br />be supplied by fossil fuels, as discussed in Chapter Three. As a result, the production <br />of petroleum products derived from oil shale will entail significantly higher emissions <br />of carbon dioxide, compared with conventional crude oil production and refining. In <br />addition, the high temperatures associated with surface retorting can cause a release <br />of carbon dioxide from mineral carbonates contained in oil shale. <br />A significant number of individuals, nongovernmental organizations, and firms <br />in the United States have expressed their concerns with the adverse consequences of <br />continued levels of greenhouse gas emissions. It is not unreasonable to anticipate that <br />individuals and organizations concerned with the lack of progress by the U.S. gov- <br />ernment in addressing global warming will oppose oil shale development. <br />Opportunities for Action. The U.S. government has not yet adopted a strategy <br />directed at significantly reducing emissions of greenhouse gases. The prospect of oil <br />shale development provides an additional motivation for consideration of market- <br />based approaches, such as carbon taxes or "cap and trade" programs, so that green- <br />house gas reductions can be achieved in an economically efficient way. If a market- <br />based approach is adopted for the United States, the costs of minimizing, controlling, <br />or trading greenhouse gas emissions in oil shale production will be shifted to the pro- <br />ducers and consumers of shale oil and shale oil-derived petroleum products. Under <br />such a framework, the decision, at least with regard to greenhouse gas emissions, <br />about whether to go forward with oil shale development, and how, will be industry's <br />and not the government's. <br /> <br />Water Quality <br />Challenges. All of the Green River Formation oil shale deposits lie within the <br />Colorado River drainage basin. Degradation in water quality stemming from oil shale <br />development could have adverse consequences not only to the Colorado River Basin <br />