My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12680
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSPC12680
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:17:25 PM
Creation date
8/7/2007 12:09:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.200.05.J
Description
Water Projects - Other Projects - Hoover-Meade-Boulder - Other Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/4/1998
Author
AZ - CO - NV - NM - UT - WO
Title
Proposal for Interim Lake Meade Reservoir Operation Criteria Related to Surplus-Normal-and Shortage Year Declarations - Interim Report-Supplement - 12-04-98
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002235 <br /> <br />to the Six States. These parameters are consistent with and based upon the principles descn'bed in <br />the paper issued by the Six States on October 20, 1998 titled Background and Principles for <br />Negotiation - Special Interim Criteria for Releases of Water from Lake Mead During <br />Implementation of the California 4.4 Plan. <br /> <br />II. Consistencv with the Law of the River <br />It goes without saying that any interim operating criteria implemented to assist California <br />in its program to eliminate its dependence on Colorado River water above its basic apportionment <br />must be consistent with the Law of the River. Of particular importance in developing the interim <br />criteria will be the apportionment system decreed by the United States Supreme Court under <br />which water diverted into any of the three Lower Division States must fit within one of three <br />categories: <br />1.) The water diverted is within that state's basic apportionment. Article II(B)(l) of <br />the Decree, 374 U.S. 340 (1964). <br />2.) The water diverted is water that has been declared by the Secretary of the Interior <br />as surplus water available above the 7.5 maf basic apportionment available to the Lower Division <br />States. It must also be recognized that, of any amount declared to be available as surplus, only <br />50% of that amount is available to California, unless Arizona or Nevada choose not to divert and <br />use the 46% and 4% of the surplus amount that is available to those states, respectively. Article <br /> <br />II(B)(2). <br />3.) <br /> <br />The water diverted is water that was available to one of the other Lower Division <br /> <br />States in accordance with a) or b), above, but was unused by that state. Article IT(B)(6). <br /> <br />m. Other Policy Considerations <br />In addition to the need for the interim reservoir operating criteria to be consistent with the <br />existing Law of the River, the Six States assert that, as a matter of fa?rness to all Colorado River <br />Basin States, the process of developing and promulgating interim criteria shall be consistent with <br />the fo1l9wing principles: <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.