Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002~~6 <br /> <br />Water use from the Dolores Project is not yet fully developed and the total <br />estimated average annual return flows have not been realized in the San Juan <br />River. For example, the City of Cortez and the Town of Dove Creek have <br />returned approximately 4,200 acre-feet (AF) of their Project M&I water <br />allocation to the Dolores Water conservancy District (DWCD), indicating they <br />did not have a current use for the water and would not have a use in the <br />future. The Ute Mountain Ute Jribe currently irrigates only about 4000 acres <br />of their total 7,500 acres of Dolores Project lands. Also, the average annual <br />demand for project supplemental water may be less than anticipated due to <br />improvements made to the delivery systems and the change from flood to <br />sprinkler irrigation. <br /> <br />The proposed action includes the acquisition of at least 7,200_AF of water for <br />release downstream to'the Dolores River. The water would be acquired in two <br />increments. The first increment of 3,900 AF would be provided permanently by <br />the DWCD as an additional prcject water use, thus not limiting full <br />development of the Project as planned. This action would slightly decrease <br />the return flows to the San Juan River by slightly increasing the frequency <br />and severity of Project irrigation water shortages. The average annual supply <br />c: Project irrigation water would be reduced by approximately 1%, reducing the <br />estimated average annual return flows by approx~ately 1% or 200 AF. The <br />second increment c! 3,300 AF would be provided temporarily (up.tC 5 years) ~y <br />t~e Ute Mountain Ute Tribe from a portion 0: their currently unused Prcject <br />~==iga~ion a~lo=a~~o~. A permanen~ s~~=ce =c= ~his wa~e= has nc~ ye~ bee~ <br /> <br />identi.= ie"c. <br /> <br />~he WO=5~ case scenaric :0= ac~~isi~ion of this in==emen~ c= <br /> <br />wa~er, as it per~a~ns ~c po~en~~al ~e~u~n :lOW5 ~o ~he San Jua~ River! would <br />be ~o acquire 3,300 AF c= cu=rently unused Project M&~ wa~er. ~his ac~ion <br />wo~lc reduce ~he e5~~rnatec po~e~~~a: 2verage annual ~e~u~n ::ows ~= ~he San <br /> <br />Juan River by :,E50 AT. <br /> <br />7~ere=c=e ~hE maximum =educ~~o~ c= es~~~a~e= ave=age <br /> <br />annua: poter.~ia: ret~rn ::ows ~= ~he San Juan Rive= resul~~n~ :ro~ <br />impiemen~ation c= ~he p=oposec a=~~o~ ~oulc be :,850 AF. -p is ~cpc~~an~ ~c <br />nc~e ~ha~ ~hi5 ~s a redu~~ic~ c= po~en~ia: :lows, no= ac~ua: =lows, as ~he <br />water tna~ would be ac~~~rec has neve= ~een diverted for use i~ the Sa~ J~an <br /> <br />basin. <br /> <br />The estimated average annual Project retur~ flows of 25,000 AF, based on :u:: <br />Project development, were included in the San Juan River baseline in the 1951 <br />Final Biological Opinion for the Animas-La Flata Project. Estimated average <br />annual Project return flows were reduced to 22,000 AF in the San Juan River <br />baseline used in t.he 1996 Draft Biological Opinion for the Animas-La Pla-:.a <br />Project, based on implementation 0: the proposed action described in the <br />February 1995 Draft Enviror~ental Assessment of the Proposal to Modify <br />Operation of McPhee Reservoir and Acquire Additional Water for Fish and <br />Wildlife Purposes. <br /> <br />SPECIES ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />The Colorado s~~awfish and the =a:crback sucker are known tc exist ,- portions <br />0= the San Juan Rive~ dDwns~~eam c: ~he=e Dolo~es ?=cje=~ ~==~;a~~on re~~~~ <br />=lows ente~ the =ive~ (Pla~ania, :99Cj. ~he majc~i~y 0: ~~e5e ~e~~r~ :~o~s <br />e~~e= ~he San J~a~ ~~ve= c~ ~~e ~=~l~= C=eek ~~~=luence {?~ ~QGj. <br /> <br />R""oe:-: <br /> <br />arl~ P:e:..=er <br /> <br />{:99S} <br />. . <br /> <br />s::cwec <br /> <br />-.... -- <br />_....c:.... <br /> <br />::::'c~c.dc <br /> <br />s~~awfi.s:: <br /> <br />aci~l~s <br /> <br />, <br />~sec c. S:lic.__ <br />