Laserfiche WebLink
<br />W AIS Document Retrieval <br /> <br />002G92 <br /> <br />In a review of historical and contemporary records of Empidonax <br />traillii extimus throughout its range, Unitt (1987) noted that the <br />species has "declined precipitously * * *" and that "the population <br />is clearly much smaller now than 50 years ago.' I He believed the total <br />was "well under' I 1000 pairs, more likely 500 (Unitt 1987). Nesting <br />groups monitored since that time.have continued to decline (Whitfield <br />1990, Brown 1991, Sogge and Tibbitts 1992, Whitfield and Laymon, <br />unpubl. data). Since 1992, more than 800 historic and new locations <br />have been surveyed range wide to document the status of the <br />southwestern willow flycatcher (USFWS, unpubl. data). The current known <br />population of southwestern willow flycatchers is estimated at between <br />300 and 500 pairs (Sogge et al. 1997). This indicates a critical <br />population status, with more than 75 percent of the locations where- <br />flycatchers are found having five or fewer territorial birds and up to <br />20 percent of the locations having single, unmated individuals. The <br />distribution of breeding groups is highly fragmented, with groups often <br />separated by considerable distances (e.g., approximately 88 kilometers <br />(km) (55 miles) straight-line distance between breeding flycatchers at <br />Roosevelt Lake, Gila County, Arizona, and the next closest breeding <br />groups known on either the San Pedro River (Pinal County) or Verde <br />River (Yavapai County). Additional survey effort, particularly in <br />southern California, may discover additional small breeding groups. <br />However, rangewide survey efforts have yielded positive results in <br />fewer than 10 percent of surveyed locations. Moreover, survey results <br />reveal a consistent pattern range wide; the southwestern willow <br />flycatcher population as a whole is comprised of extremely small, <br />widely-separated breeding groups or unmated flycatchers. <br />For a thorough discussion of the ecology and life history of the <br />southwestern willow flycatcher, see Sogge et al. (1997), the proposed <br />rule to list the southwestern willow flycatcher as endangered with <br />critical habitat (58 FR 39495) or the final rule listing the <br />southwestern willow flycatcher as endangered (60 FR 10694) . <br /> <br />Previous Federal Actions <br /> <br />On January 25, 1992, a coalition of conservation organizations <br />petitioned the Service, requesting listing of Empidonax traillii <br />extimus as an endangered species, under the Act. The petitioners also <br />appealed for emergency listing, and designation of critical habitat. On <br />September 1, 1992, the Service published a finding that the petition <br />presented substantial information indicating that listing may be <br />warranted and requested public comments and biological data on the <br />species (57 FR 39664). On July 23, 1993, the Service published a <br />proposal to list E. t. extimus as endangered with critical habitat (58 <br />FR 39495), and again requested public comments and biological data on <br />the species. The Service published a final rule to list E. t. extimus <br />as endangered on February 27/ 1995 (60 FR 10694). The Service deferred <br />the designation of critical habitat for this endangered species until <br />July 23, 1995, pursuant to 16 U.S.C. Sec. 1533(b) (6) (C), citing issues <br />raised in public comments, new information, and the lack of the <br />economic information necessary to perform the required economic <br />analysis. The Service reopened the comment period on the proposal to <br />designate critical habitat. During and following the listing moratorium <br />and a series of rescissions of listing funds imposed by Congress from <br />April 1995 to April 1996, the Service took no action on the proposal to <br />designate critical habitat due to resource constraints. On March 20, <br />1997, the U.S. District Court of Arizona, in response to a suit by the <br />Southwest Center for Biological Diversity, ordered the Service to <br />designate critical habitat for the southwestern willow flycatcher <br />within 120 days. On July 3, 1997, the Court clarified that order, <br />noting that the 120-day timeframe was provided for the Service to make <br />a decision as to whether or not to designate critical habitat and not <br />to make a substantive determination of designation. <br />The Service has not previously designated critical habitat for the <br /> <br />Tuesday, July 22, 1997 <br /> <br />Page 3 of21 <br /> <br />2:0S PM <br />