Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~;'> t" iiving Rivers News and Announcements <br /> <br />Page 1 of2 <br /> <br />;, i) 3 I 8 7 <br />iJt 'U <br /> <br /> <br />Search <br /> <br />-II <br /> <br />Home <br /> <br />About <br /> <br />News Archives <br /> <br />Campaigns <br /> <br />Joi <br /> <br />LR Press Release <br />July 22, 2003 <br /> <br />House votes to destroy Colorado River Delta wetlands <br /> <br />Taxpayer money to be wasted on mothballed desalting plant; Senate yet to act <br /> <br />Contacts: <br />Owen Lammers, Living Rivers, POB 466 * Moab, UT 84532 * 435-259-1063/fax 259-7612 <br />Lisa Force, Living Rivers, POB 1589 * Scottsdale, AZ 85252 * 303-237-2269/fax 480-990-2662 <br />Kara Gillion, Defenders of Wildlife * 824 Gold SW, Albuquerque * 505-248-0118 <br /> <br />The U.S. House of Representatives voted last Friday to retool a defunct desalting plant near Yuma, Arizona. The <br />Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau) estimates the cost of repairing the now obsolete plant technology at $26 million. The <br />decision was made despite the reality that operating the plant will destroy the majority of wetland habitat in the <br />Colorado River delta region, and that far less costly measures are available to meet US treaty obligations for water <br />delivery to Mexico. <br /> <br />"At a time when federal deficits are skyrocketing, it's unbelievable that Congress would consider throwing away <br />taxpayers dollars to retool this plant, " says Lisa Force, program director for Living Rivers. "This is pork barrel politics <br />its worst." <br /> <br />The inclusion of the provision in the House report on the 2004 Energy and Water Appropriations bill allows for re- <br />operating the Yuma Desalting Plant, a measure which the Bureau estimates will cost a minimum of $36 million <br />annually. Completed in 1992 at a cost of $256 million to clean up brackish wastewater from farms in southern Arizo", <br />the plant was shut down several months later due to extremely high operating costs. The Bureau of Reclamation has <br />down played an alternative solution costing 33% to 85 % less-just $6 million to $26 million annually-involving paying <br />willing sellers to lease water they presently do not need. <br /> <br />The agricultural wastewater that the plant would process is now funneled into the Cienega de Santa Clara, a 40,000- <br />acre open water ecosystem in the Colorado River delta region. The desalting plant would remove the entire flow from <br />the cienega and return only highly saline brine to the wetlands. <br /> <br />"This provision would destroy an extremely important wetland in Mexico that contains the largest remaining populatiol <br />of Yuma Clapper Rail in the world," says Bill Snape, Defenders of Wildlife Vice President for Law and Litigation. "It wi <br />be impossible to replace the value of the Cienega de Santa Clara to the Colorado River ecosystem." <br /> <br />The cienega is the largest remaining wetland in the southwest Americas and is home to fifty-six threatened, <br />endangered and declining species. Several scientific studies funded by the Depatment of Interior confirm that the <br />wetland would be completely destroyed by desalter operations. <br /> <br />"This is reminiscent of the days of old, when the Bureau wasted tax payer money left and right, leaving renowned <br />habitat laid to waste," says John Weisheit, conservation director of Living Rivers and the designated Colorado <br />Riverkeeper. <br /> <br />''We are disappointed that some members of Congress wish to move forward with such an expensive and destructive <br />proposal. Congress mandated public involvement in Colorado River management but we fear the public is not being <br />heard," says Steve Glazer, Chair of the Sierra Club Colorado River Task Force. <br /> <br />''We're fighting hard to ensure the Senate does not duplicate the folly of the House," adds Lisa Force. The U.S. Senal <br /> <br />http://www.1ivingrivers.net/archives/artic1e.cfrn ?NewsID=494 <br /> <br />7/24/2003 <br />