My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12656
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12656
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:17:10 PM
Creation date
8/6/2007 1:52:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10.B
Description
Colorado River - Water Projects - Glen Canyon Dam-Lake Powell - Glen Canyon TWG
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
7/1/2004
Author
Schmidt - Topping - Grams - Goeking
Title
The Degraded Reach - Rate and Pattern of Bed and Bank Adjustment of the Colorado River in the 25 km Immediately Downstream from Glen Canyon Dam - 07-01-04
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002489 <br /> <br />,...._---J <br /> <br />sections and the occurrence of differential erosion demonstrate that the longitudinal <br />profile that has developed as the riverbed eroded must be related to the distribution of the <br />bed sediment grain sizes. This indicates that the largest sediment buried in the bed was <br />located at the mouths of the largest tributaries, which have emerged as channel controls <br />as the finer sediment was evacuated from the bed. Therefore, occurrence of pool and <br />riffle segments exhibited in Glen Canyon appears to be related to the interaction between <br />tributary sediment delivery and mainstem sediment reworking, rather than a display of <br />classic pool-riffle morphology. <br />The bed lowering that established the modified post-dam water-surface profile <br />and resulted in perched gravel and sand deposits throughout the reach occurred in one <br />brief period, while sediment evacuation from the non-control sections is an ongoing <br />process. The recent post-dam high flows of the 1980s and 1996, which were probably <br />responsible for most ofthe sediment evacuation from the pools, did not cause further <br />lowering of the bed at channel controls. Based on these observations, it seems that future <br />lowering of the bed at channel controls, causing further shifts in the stage-discharge <br />relations, is very unlikely. Conversely, depending on the rate of tributary sediment <br />delivery and the size of supplied sediment, aggradation of channel controls is a <br />possibility. Aggradation of channel controls has been suggested for debris-fan dominated <br />canyons where floods have been eliminated (Graf, 1980; Webb, 1997). Continued <br />evacuation of sediment from pools should be expected during high power plant releases <br />and floods. It may, therefore, be useful to continue monitoring those cross-sections. <br />The volume of sediment that has been degraded from the bed in Glen Canyon is <br />large relative to post-dam sediment loads, but small relative to the pre-dam suspended <br />sediment loads. Approximately 18.4 million Mg of sediment has been excavated from <br />the bed of the Glen Canyon Reach (assuming the eroded sediment had a specific gravity <br />of2.65 and a porosity of 35%). This is 275 times the estimated annual post-dam input of <br />sediment of all sizes from ungaged tributaries in the study area, but just one-third the pre- <br />dam annual load of suspended sediment (sand and finer material) measured at Lees Ferry. <br /> <br />39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.