My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12655
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12655
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:17:09 PM
Creation date
8/6/2007 1:47:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10.B
Description
Colorado River - Water Projects - Glen Canyon Dam-Lake Powell - Glen Canyon TWG
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/1/2004
Author
Schmidt - Topping - Grams - Hazel
Title
System-Wide Changes in the Distribution of Fine Sediment in the Colorado River Corridor Between Glen Canyon Dam and Bright Angel Creek - Arizona - Final Report - 10-01-04
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002356 <br /> <br />10' <br /> <br />(JJ <br />ffi 10' <br />I- <br />W <br />:i: <br />w <br />c:: <br />:3 10' <br />a <br />(JJ <br />~ <br />i1I <br />~ 102 <br /> <br /> <br />- Lees Ferry <br />- - Redwall Gorge <br />. . . - . PI. Hansbrough <br />. - . - Tapeats Gorge <br />_um Big Bend <br /> <br />./ <br />: / <br />. .-- <br />.. :/ <br />. :' ,. <br />.' : J.' <br />~ :~. <br />.,- ~.: <br />! :i.' <br />.' {' <br />1/',' <br />'/" .;' <br />0'" .;.... <br />(~. ../ <br />:!..'-" -.' <br /> <br />10 <br />.01 .1 <br /> <br />5 10 2030 50 7080 90 95 99 99.9 99.99 <br /> <br />PERCENT SMALLER THAN INDICATED SIZE <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />B.. <br /> <br />10' : <br /> <br />(JJ <br />c:: <br />W <br />I- <br />W <br />:i: <br />w <br />c:: <br />:3 10' <br />a <br />(JJ <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br />IX <br />< <br /> <br />- Lees Ferry <br />- - Redwall Gorge <br />. . . . . Pl. Hansbrough <br />. - . - T apeats Gorge <br />.._m Big Bend <br /> <br /> <br />.,~~" -. <br />.' , <br />. . <br />,:' I <br />,/:.,. -. <br />f-''''' <br />..il. <br />" , <br />:',' I <br />,f . ~ <br />i ,: , <br />,. ; I <br />- ./ <br />. .', <br />_~ r <br />.f.-' <br />. If" <br />~,; ;:. <br />._,,;::':;~"" <br /> <br /> <br />10' . <br />.01 .1 <br /> <br />5 10 2030 50 7080 90 95 <br /> <br />99 99.9 99.99 <br /> <br />PERCENT SMALLER THAN INDICATED SIZE <br /> <br />Figure 12. Graphs showing cumulative distribution of EDZs in 5 study reaches. A. distribution of all EDZs. B. <br />distribution for those EDZs larger than 1000 m2. <br /> <br />of eddy deposition. The distribution of EDZ <br />sizes is log-normal (Fig. 12), and the mean <br />EDZ area is between 1.3 and 5 times larger <br />than the median (Table 3). EDZs of moderate <br />size have the most significant potential storage <br />area for fine sediment, because the size class <br />with the greatest cumulative area is that be- <br />tween 10,000 and 20,000 m2. <br />The frequency ofEDZs is an indication of <br />the proportion of fine-sediment deposits that <br />form in eddies. The frequency ofEDZs is low <br />in the Lees Ferry and Big Bend Reaches, and a <br />large proportion of fine sediment occurs as <br />channel-margin deposits. However, the total <br />area of eddy bars also depends on the width of <br />the zone available for fine sediment deposition. . <br />The largest total area of EDZs per unit river <br />length occurs in the Tapeats Gorge Reach <br />where EDZs are the most frequent and the <br />baseflow channel width is about 70% ofthe <br />channel width at flood flow. The smallest total <br />area of EDZs per unit river length is in the <br />Redwall Gorge Reach where EDZs are rela- <br />tively frequent but the base flow channel is <br />about 77% of the channel width of flood flows. <br /> <br />3.3 Sedimentology of Fine-Sediment Alluvial <br />Deposits <br /> <br />---- <br /> <br />Fine sediment of the Colorado River occurs <br />as terraces and flood plains, and these deposits <br />can be subdivided by facies and by the minimum <br />discharge that inundates their surfaces. The <br />former subdivisions are primarily between eddy <br />bars and channel-margin deposits. The latter <br />subdivisions are grouped as (1) pre-dam flood <br />deposits, (2) post-dam flood deposits, and (3) <br />post-dam fluctuating-flow deposits. The distri- <br />bution of these deposits in a specific year was <br />mapped near Lees Ferry (Hereford et aI., 2000b), <br />Nankoweap Rapids (Hereford et aI., 1998), <br />Palisades Creek (Hereford, 1996), and Granite <br />Park (Hereford et aI., 2000a). <br />Pre-dam and post-dam fine-sediment <br />deposits have many similarities. The landforms <br />of both deposits are primarily those of eddy bars <br />or channel-margin deposits (Schmidt and Rubin, <br />1995). Sedimentary structures are primarily <br />those formed by climbing ripples (McKee, 1938; <br />Rubin et aI., 1990). Active eddy bars also <br />include cross-bedding and wave structures; <br /> <br />18 System-wide Changes in the Distribution of Fine Sediment in the Colorado River Corridor ... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.