My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12642
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12642
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:17:07 PM
Creation date
8/6/2007 1:28:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.215
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations-Entities - Colorado River Workgroup
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/3000
Author
James S Lochead
Title
Outline of the Law of the Colorado River - James S Lochhead - Date Unknown Briefing paper
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-' <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Oil0833 <br /> <br />Outline of the Law of the Colorado River <br />James S. Lochhead <br />Brownstein, Hyatt & Farber, P.C. <br />Glenwood Springs, CO <br /> <br />I. <br />A. <br /> <br />WATER ALLOCATION ISSUES <br /> <br />Colorado River Compact <br />1. Apportions consumptive use of the waters of the Colorado River Basin <br />2. 7.5 mafto Upper Basin, 8.5 mafto Lower Basin (including Lower Basin <br />Tributaries) <br />3. Upper Basin may not deplete the flow of the Colorado River Mainstem below 75 <br />mafin any lO-year period <br />4. 1922 Compact, Article III (e) - ''The States of the upper division shall not <br />withhold water, and the States ofthe lower division shall not require the delivery <br />of water, which cannot reasonably be applied to domestic and agricultural uses." <br />5. Did not deal with Indian reserved rights or Mexican deliver issues <br />6. Lower Basin (California) View - Compact necessary to secure political support <br />for Congress to authorize construction of Hoover Dam and the All-American <br />Canal <br />7. Upper Basin View - Compact was necessary to achieve security: <br />a. A defined right to develop, in perpetuity, See Article III(a) <br />b. No interstate operation ofthe prior appropriation doctrine, See Articles III <br />(a), III (e), IV (b), VIII <br />c. Eliminating the threat of federal control over water allocation, both intra- <br />and inter-state, and preserving intrastate prior appropriation and <br />administration, See Articles III (a), III (b), III (c), IV, VII, Boulder Canyon <br />Proj ect Act <br />d. Avoiding litigation, See Article I <br />e. Establishing a foundation for the comprehensive development of <br />reservoirs in the basin, See 1928 Boulder Canyon Project Act, 1956 <br />Colorado River Storage Project Act, 1968 Colorado River Basin Project <br />Act <br /> <br />Mexican Water Treaty - Creates "fIrst call" on the River of 1.5 maflyr., delivered at the <br />intemational.boundary <br />1. Lower Basin View - Upper Basin shares one-half of the burden <br />2. Upper Basin View - Lower Basin bears entire burden <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.