<br />state's agriculture economy would be meas-
<br />ured in the billions of dollars.
<br />What is more, Fisher says, because ac-
<br />cess to irrigation water in California de-
<br />pends on the historical system of first-come,
<br />first-served water rights, those losses will
<br />likely be absorbed primarily by the farmers
<br />lowest on the water-rights totem pole, driv-
<br />ing many out of business. That same pattern
<br />is likely to hold true in the Northwest, par-
<br />ticularly in the dry lands east of the Cas-
<br />cades. "It's not going to be feasible to have
<br />the irrigated acreage we have now," Mote
<br />says-fighting words in a region long wed-
<br />ded to an agricultural way oflife.
<br />Forests are also likely to suffer, accord-
<br />ing to Anthony WesterIing, a climate re-
<br />searcher at Scripps. Westerling recently fed
<br />data from Cayan and Knowles's climate
<br />and hydrology models of the Sierras into a
<br />model of his own that attempts to forecast
<br />changes in wildfires. WesterIing says his
<br />preliminary results show that fire danger
<br />will soar. "The mean area burned more than
<br />doubled by 2090" relative to the present,
<br />Westerling says.
<br />Although less easily quantified, low sum-
<br />mertime stream flows are also expected to
<br />exacerbate problems with declining. fish
<br />runs, crimp water supplies for recreation and
<br />cities, and increase the likelihood of winter
<br />and springtime flooding throughout the
<br />Northwest and Califomia. But not all the im-
<br />pacts are sure to be bad. Last
<br />year, John Fazio, a river flow an-
<br />alyst with the Northwest Power
<br />and Conservation Council in
<br />Portland, plugged some of the
<br />UWgroup's hydrology forecasts
<br />into his Columbia River flow
<br />models and found that a warmer
<br />Northwest may actually benefit
<br />Northwest electricity consumers.
<br />Warmer winters, Fazio says, will
<br />likely lower the need for electric-
<br />ity during the region's peak de-
<br />mand period, and an expected
<br />small increase in wintertime pre-
<br />cipitation could churn generators
<br />~ to the tune of an extra 1900 megawatts of
<br />~ power-nearly enough to power two cities
<br />~ the size of Seattle. Of course, if precipitation
<br />~ swings toward the dry side, it could wind up
<br />~ costing rate payers hundreds of millions of
<br />~ dollars, he says.
<br />~ No matter how the climate evolves, water
<br />'3
<br />~ managers will face uncomfortable tradeoffs
<br />~ between providing water for agriculture, hy-
<br />a dropower, and recreation, and keeping it in
<br />: streams to support fish runs. In their current
<br />~ Climatic Change paper, for ef{ample, Letten-
<br />g maier and colleagues show that to keep sum-
<br />~ mertime flow levels in the Columbia River
<br />~ high enough to support endangered-fish re-
<br />u covery plans, water managers will likely
<br />
<br />000792
<br />
<br />have to sacrifice 10% to 20% of the river's
<br />wintertime hydropower generating capacity,
<br />because it will force water managers to draw
<br />down their reservoirs in the summer. "Even
<br />with these reductions in power, late-summer
<br />minimum flows would still be lower than at
<br />present," the authors write.
<br />
<br />More big dams?
<br />In a region prone to water shortages, talk of
<br />such tradeoffs doesn't go down easy. "We
<br />already have a problem with shortages,"
<br />says Maury Roos, chief hydrologist for the
<br />state of California. And coming up with the
<br />water to deal with population growth
<br />throughout the region is already an acute
<br />problem, he adds. ''This will certainly make
<br />the problem worse."
<br />In hopes of head-
<br />ing off some of those
<br />problems, Roos and
<br />other water officials
<br />are beginning to in-
<br />corporate climate
<br />change into their re-
<br />gional water plans.
<br />California's latest
<br />draft water plan, for
<br />example, discusses
<br />climate change, al-
<br />though it doesn't yet
<br />recommend changing
<br />California's infra-
<br />
<br />structure. Portland, Seattle, and other cities
<br />have begun studying the issue in detail to
<br />see whether they need to change their water-
<br />management plans.
<br />Initial rumblings are also being heard
<br />among advocates for building new dams
<br />throughout the West. That comes as some-
<br />thing of a surprise to many, because during
<br />the Clinton Administration, then-Secretary
<br />of the Interior Bruce Babbitt claimed that
<br />the era of big dam building was over, due
<br />to their adverse impacts on fish and
<br />wildlife. Already, for example, California is
<br />considering building several new dams as
<br />part of a joint state and federal effort to
<br />provide water for threatened ecosystems
<br />
<br />NEWS Focus
<br />
<br />while keeping water available for farmers.
<br />Washington too is flirting with building a
<br />dam at a cost of more than $ I billion in the
<br />eastern part of the state to provide irriga-
<br />tion water for farmers near Yakima. And
<br />Idaho water managers say that climate
<br />change may force them to build new reser-
<br />voirs to prevent winter floods along the
<br />Boise River, where one-third of the state's
<br />inhabitants currently live.
<br />But due to their high dollar and environ-
<br />mental costs, many water experts doubt
<br />whether such projects will go forward.
<br />"Dams are tough fights and so expensive,"
<br />says Hal Anderson, planning chief for the
<br />Idaho Department of Water Resources. And
<br />even jf built, they will only soften the blow.
<br />
<br />Dangerous consequences. Over the next cen-
<br />tury, larger winter and spring runoffs from
<br />melting snow are expected to increase flood-
<br />ing and catastrophic wildfires.
<br />
<br />With the amount of spring snow expected to
<br />be lost due to climate change, ''there is no
<br />way we're going to build that many dams to
<br />capture it all," Mote says.
<br />Other strategies may help. Most water
<br />officials agree that there is much that can be
<br />done to conserve water, particularly by lin-
<br />ing irrigation canals and making other im-
<br />provements to irrigation. As well, a handful
<br />of new programs have sprung up recently to
<br />buy or lease water rights from fanners and
<br />then keep the water in stream during the
<br />low-flow months to improve habitat for fish.
<br />Last year, for example, one umbrella effort
<br />called the Columbia Basin Water Transac-
<br />tions Program sponsored 32 such deals to
<br />keep 28.4 million cubic meters of water in
<br />tributaries where it's needed most. That
<br />amount of water pales in comparison to
<br />what stands to be lost. But for now, water
<br />planners still have some time to act before
<br />climate change alters the American West in
<br />a way humans have never witnessed.
<br />-ROBERT F. SElMa
<br />
<br />www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 303 20 FEBRUARY 2004
<br />
<br />
<br />1127
<br />
|