Laserfiche WebLink
<br />state's agriculture economy would be meas- <br />ured in the billions of dollars. <br />What is more, Fisher says, because ac- <br />cess to irrigation water in California de- <br />pends on the historical system of first-come, <br />first-served water rights, those losses will <br />likely be absorbed primarily by the farmers <br />lowest on the water-rights totem pole, driv- <br />ing many out of business. That same pattern <br />is likely to hold true in the Northwest, par- <br />ticularly in the dry lands east of the Cas- <br />cades. "It's not going to be feasible to have <br />the irrigated acreage we have now," Mote <br />says-fighting words in a region long wed- <br />ded to an agricultural way oflife. <br />Forests are also likely to suffer, accord- <br />ing to Anthony WesterIing, a climate re- <br />searcher at Scripps. Westerling recently fed <br />data from Cayan and Knowles's climate <br />and hydrology models of the Sierras into a <br />model of his own that attempts to forecast <br />changes in wildfires. WesterIing says his <br />preliminary results show that fire danger <br />will soar. "The mean area burned more than <br />doubled by 2090" relative to the present, <br />Westerling says. <br />Although less easily quantified, low sum- <br />mertime stream flows are also expected to <br />exacerbate problems with declining. fish <br />runs, crimp water supplies for recreation and <br />cities, and increase the likelihood of winter <br />and springtime flooding throughout the <br />Northwest and Califomia. But not all the im- <br />pacts are sure to be bad. Last <br />year, John Fazio, a river flow an- <br />alyst with the Northwest Power <br />and Conservation Council in <br />Portland, plugged some of the <br />UWgroup's hydrology forecasts <br />into his Columbia River flow <br />models and found that a warmer <br />Northwest may actually benefit <br />Northwest electricity consumers. <br />Warmer winters, Fazio says, will <br />likely lower the need for electric- <br />ity during the region's peak de- <br />mand period, and an expected <br />small increase in wintertime pre- <br />cipitation could churn generators <br />~ to the tune of an extra 1900 megawatts of <br />~ power-nearly enough to power two cities <br />~ the size of Seattle. Of course, if precipitation <br />~ swings toward the dry side, it could wind up <br />~ costing rate payers hundreds of millions of <br />~ dollars, he says. <br />~ No matter how the climate evolves, water <br />'3 <br />~ managers will face uncomfortable tradeoffs <br />~ between providing water for agriculture, hy- <br />a dropower, and recreation, and keeping it in <br />: streams to support fish runs. In their current <br />~ Climatic Change paper, for ef{ample, Letten- <br />g maier and colleagues show that to keep sum- <br />~ mertime flow levels in the Columbia River <br />~ high enough to support endangered-fish re- <br />u covery plans, water managers will likely <br /> <br />000792 <br /> <br />have to sacrifice 10% to 20% of the river's <br />wintertime hydropower generating capacity, <br />because it will force water managers to draw <br />down their reservoirs in the summer. "Even <br />with these reductions in power, late-summer <br />minimum flows would still be lower than at <br />present," the authors write. <br /> <br />More big dams? <br />In a region prone to water shortages, talk of <br />such tradeoffs doesn't go down easy. "We <br />already have a problem with shortages," <br />says Maury Roos, chief hydrologist for the <br />state of California. And coming up with the <br />water to deal with population growth <br />throughout the region is already an acute <br />problem, he adds. ''This will certainly make <br />the problem worse." <br />In hopes of head- <br />ing off some of those <br />problems, Roos and <br />other water officials <br />are beginning to in- <br />corporate climate <br />change into their re- <br />gional water plans. <br />California's latest <br />draft water plan, for <br />example, discusses <br />climate change, al- <br />though it doesn't yet <br />recommend changing <br />California's infra- <br /> <br />structure. Portland, Seattle, and other cities <br />have begun studying the issue in detail to <br />see whether they need to change their water- <br />management plans. <br />Initial rumblings are also being heard <br />among advocates for building new dams <br />throughout the West. That comes as some- <br />thing of a surprise to many, because during <br />the Clinton Administration, then-Secretary <br />of the Interior Bruce Babbitt claimed that <br />the era of big dam building was over, due <br />to their adverse impacts on fish and <br />wildlife. Already, for example, California is <br />considering building several new dams as <br />part of a joint state and federal effort to <br />provide water for threatened ecosystems <br /> <br />NEWS Focus <br /> <br />while keeping water available for farmers. <br />Washington too is flirting with building a <br />dam at a cost of more than $ I billion in the <br />eastern part of the state to provide irriga- <br />tion water for farmers near Yakima. And <br />Idaho water managers say that climate <br />change may force them to build new reser- <br />voirs to prevent winter floods along the <br />Boise River, where one-third of the state's <br />inhabitants currently live. <br />But due to their high dollar and environ- <br />mental costs, many water experts doubt <br />whether such projects will go forward. <br />"Dams are tough fights and so expensive," <br />says Hal Anderson, planning chief for the <br />Idaho Department of Water Resources. And <br />even jf built, they will only soften the blow. <br /> <br />Dangerous consequences. Over the next cen- <br />tury, larger winter and spring runoffs from <br />melting snow are expected to increase flood- <br />ing and catastrophic wildfires. <br /> <br />With the amount of spring snow expected to <br />be lost due to climate change, ''there is no <br />way we're going to build that many dams to <br />capture it all," Mote says. <br />Other strategies may help. Most water <br />officials agree that there is much that can be <br />done to conserve water, particularly by lin- <br />ing irrigation canals and making other im- <br />provements to irrigation. As well, a handful <br />of new programs have sprung up recently to <br />buy or lease water rights from fanners and <br />then keep the water in stream during the <br />low-flow months to improve habitat for fish. <br />Last year, for example, one umbrella effort <br />called the Columbia Basin Water Transac- <br />tions Program sponsored 32 such deals to <br />keep 28.4 million cubic meters of water in <br />tributaries where it's needed most. That <br />amount of water pales in comparison to <br />what stands to be lost. But for now, water <br />planners still have some time to act before <br />climate change alters the American West in <br />a way humans have never witnessed. <br />-ROBERT F. SElMa <br /> <br />www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 303 20 FEBRUARY 2004 <br /> <br /> <br />1127 <br />