My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12603
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSPC12603
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:17:02 PM
Creation date
8/6/2007 12:09:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10.A
Description
Colorado River - Water Projects - Glen Canyon Dam-Lake Powell - Glen Canyon AMWG
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/3000
Author
Unknown
Title
TWG-Science Advisors-GCMRC-AMWG Role and Function - Date Unknown
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001928 <br /> <br />Science Advisors Role and Function <br />1. Provide review of the program. <br />2. Respond to specific requests from AMWG to review/critique GCMRC science plans and/or <br />address other, more specific pressing science needs in the program. <br />3. Evaluate science research programs within the AMP. <br />4. Conduct periodic review of the AMP's progress <br />5. Individual review panels - come together when needed, disband when done - shouldn't be an <br />enshrined institution <br />6. Add "as appropriate and directed by AMWG" under each of the above bullets. <br />7. Provide independent, external peer review of AMP research and monitoring programs, proposals, <br />and projects. <br />8. I'm fine with the operating protocols as written. <br />9. Provide peer review for draft reports. <br />10. Distinguish between'RPs and science advisors and PEP panels <br />11. Long-term structure of SAs: how does the structure change through time? What are the terms? <br />How are the members selected? <br />12. Come to an AMWG meeting <br />13. Services of SAs should be available to AMWG, TWG, and GCMRC <br />14. Another science support arm of the AMP <br />15. Focus on major program review, science monitoring and management <br />16. Should not be involved in reviewing the function of the AMWG <br />17. Tasks should be reviewed or commented on by all parts of the AMP. <br />18. Science Advisors should be directed to review science function of the program. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.