Laserfiche WebLink
<br />U01919 <br /> <br />6 - Science Advisors may not be providing sufficient support to the AMP. <br />Solution - The Science Advisor budget should be reviewed and explored for <br />additional funding to allow greater involvement in the AMP. The SA workplan <br />should include sufficient flexibility to address unanticipated issues not originally <br />part of the 24-month workplan. <br /> <br />BUDGET <br /> <br />1 - The current budget process places key resource questions at the end ofthe process <br />instead at the start. <br />Solution- A priority-setting meeting should occur that involves the AMWG, TWG, <br />GCMRC and Science Advisors to suggest key questions, which then would result in <br />proposed scientific work to address. Feedback on what the questions costs in time <br />and money to answer given to AMWG, which uses this information to determine <br />AMP priorities. - <br /> <br />2 - Alternative funding sources and tribal funding responsibilities have not been <br />sufficiently explored, and further discussion needs to occur to understand current <br />protocols. The AMP should also consider the impacts oflong-term drought impacts, <br />including the loss of hydropower generation. <br /> <br />3 - The AMP should discuss ESA/P A compliance funding responsibilities. <br />