Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001925 <br /> <br />645 <br /> <br />BAUCH & SPAHR: SALINITY TRENDS IN SURFACE WATERS OF THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN <br /> <br />crease with the same yearly percentage that streamflow <br />increases. For example, if streamflow at the Eagle River <br />at Gypsum site increased 20% from 1982 to 1983, the <br />dissolved-solids load for the same time period would <br />increase at a rate <20%. Concentrations of dissolved <br />solids are low in snowmelt runoff. When this runoff is <br />added to the existing stream discharge, the total salinity <br />load in the stream increases but at less than the percent- <br />age that the stream discharge increases. Butler (19%) <br />gives additional possibilities for variable annual dis- <br />solved-solids loads: (i) errors associated with compu- <br />tational methods; less uncertainty may be present in <br />annual dissolved-solids loads calculated with stream dis- <br />charge and specific conductance as compared to loads <br />calculated only with stream discharge; (ii) errors in dis- <br />solved-solids load calculations arising from errors in <br />water-quality data, streamflow data, daily specific-con- <br />ductance data, and regression equations; and (iii) year- <br />to-year variations in precipitation, runoff, irrigation <br />practices, and land use. <br /> <br />time-period comparisons of concentration or monthly load <br />data. Because these values are not very useful for direct com- <br />parisons between stations, trend-slope magnitude (the relation <br />of concentration or load to time) and percent rate of change <br />between stations will not be compared for dissolved-solids <br />concentrations and monthly loads. Trends for annual loads <br />were calculated using linear regression. The flow-adjusted an- <br />nual dissolved-solids loads were regressed against time to de- <br />termine whether the regression slope significantly differed <br />from zero. Because slopes from linear regression show a linear <br />rate of change, comparison of slope magnitude and percent <br />change in annual dissolved-solids loads between stations will <br />be made. Further discussions on statistical tests for trends in <br />water quality are in Hirsch et aI. (1982), Hirsch et aI. (1991), <br />and Helsel and Hirsch (1992). <br /> <br />RESULTS <br /> <br />Annual Dissolved-Solids Loads <br /> <br />The annual dissolved-solids loads for sites in the Up- <br />per Colorado River Basin in Colorado for water years <br />1970 to 1993 are listed in Table 2. Also included are <br />the mean annual dissolved-solids load and standard de- <br />viations (SD) for each site. Annual dissolved-solids <br />loads varied in the VCOL study unit during the 1970 <br />to 1993 period. In general, the annual dissolved-solids <br />load was highest when the total annual stream discharge <br />was highest; for example, at Eagle River at Gypsum <br />and Colorado River near Dotsero (Fig. 2 and 3). As <br />explained by Butler (1996), though, there is not a 1:1 <br />or linear relationship between dissolved-solids load and <br />stream discharge. Dissolved-solids load does not in- <br /> <br />Temporal Trends <br /> <br />Results of trend tests on periodic dissolved-solids con- <br />centrations and monthly and annual dissolved-solids <br />loads for each site and time period analyzed are listed in <br />Tables 3 to 5. Results include the trend-slope magnitude, <br />the percent rate of change in the trend slope per year, <br />the P value of the test, the significance level of the slope, <br />and trend direction. Trend-slope magnitude and the per- <br />cent rate of change are shown when the P value is <0.10, <br /> <br />700,000 <br /> <br />3,500,000 <br /> <br /> <br />600,000 <br /> <br />3,000,000 <br /> <br />...\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ ... <br />" <br /> <br />500,000 <br />'<ii' <br />c <br />9 <br />'-' <br /> <br />400,000 ~ <br /> <br />2,500,000 <br /> <br />~ <br />e <br />~ 2,000,000 <br />o <br />~ <br />.c <br />~ <br />is 1,500,000 <br />! <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />""..., <br />I \ <br /> <br />'" <br />'0 <br />:= <br />o <br />~ <br />300,000 "S <br />.e <br />~ <br />is <br />200,000 <br /> <br />1,000,000 <br /> <br />100,000 <br /> <br />-Stream Discharge <br />- - - Dissolved-Solids Load <br /> <br />500,000 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br />(\~ <br />~ <br /> <br />g,1o g,'tI <br />~ ~ <br /> <br />.# <br /> <br />...~ <br /> <br />~'tJ'V ~~ <br /> <br />(\10 <br />~ <br /> <br />fb~ <br />~ <br /> <br />(\'tI <br />~ <br /> <br />~'\'V ~'\~ <br /> <br />Water Year <br />Fig. 3. Annual stream discharge and dissolved-solids loads for Colorado River near Dotsero (6), water years 1970-1993. Number after site name <br />refers to site number in Fig. 1. <br />