My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10415
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:47:52 PM
Creation date
8/3/2007 10:13:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Conejos
Stream Name
Alamosa River
Title
Assessment Report on the Alamosa River, Between Terrace Reservior and Gunbarrel Road
Date
10/1/2002
Prepared For
Alamosa River Watershed Restoration Project
Prepared By
Black Creek Hydrology, LLC
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />- <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />.. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />The sections of river that tend to be more stable include the relatively steeper and less sinuous sections such as between <br /> <br />points 32 to 43 and 86 to 96. Those reaches also contain larger bed materials than observed in the less stable sections <br /> <br /> <br />of channel. The stream reach between points 91 and 96 contains sections of channel that appear to be abnormally <br /> <br />straight and, not knowing the history of that area, there is speculation that some of the normal meander pattern may <br /> <br />have been mechanically removed. <br /> <br />The reaches that contain local sediment deposition likely act as areas of temporary sediment storage. However, high <br />flow and meander migration processes will eventually allow this stored material to be re-mobilized into the stream <br />system. The sediment will the~ eventually be available to be re-deposited at other locations and create other problems <br /> <br />including flow deflection resulting in additional bank erosion. <br /> <br />Mitigation Options <br /> <br />The sources of excess sedimeIit in the assessment reach will need to be addressed during the design of the proposed <br /> <br />river restoration downstream qf Gunbarrel Road. The river restoration work will need to incorporate efforts to remove <br /> <br />the excess sediment materials from the river system or design modifications to create a channel able to transport the <br /> <br />, <br />material all the way through 1:l1.e restored system. Sediment removal would likely require the installation of facilities to <br /> <br />, <br />capture perhaps several hundred yards of material each year, a means to remove the material from the collection areas <br /> <br />and a location to dispose of or:a means to use the captured material. Use of the material would require some <br /> <br />determination of the expected size distribution of the captured sand, gravel and cobble. <br /> <br />Conveyance of sediment in excess of the river system's needs will require that all structures and channel shaping be <br /> <br />done to maintain a high sediment transport competence in the river. This could be done by keeping channel and <br /> <br />structure width/depth ratios low and maintaining high energy gradients. These actions will require that all structures <br /> <br />I <br />and bed armoring be done to withstand the higher energy required to transport materials. This effort will need to be <br /> <br />implemented the entire length of the restoration reach. <br /> <br />Alternatively, efforts could be:implemented to stabilize the eroding banks downstream of Terrace Reservoir and reduce <br /> <br />the sediment sources. A total of about 8,500 linear feet of eroding bank was identified at 60 locations. The average <br /> <br />eroding bank is about 145 feet'long and about 4 feet tall. It is estimated that an additional 2,000 to 2,500 linear feet of <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.