Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mvt'1 - <br />Bi,).... -- <br />T~ . <br />~i-v/JW--' -~ <br /> <br />20A,_ 'if <br />.... .. <br /> <br />F'ff. <br /> <br />Aurora <br /> <br />Dina Bunn, Aurora Reporter - 892-2562 <br /> <br />Dam inadequate <br />i,n worst case, <br />engineers say <br /> <br />Corps to begin study <br />for improvements at <br />Cherry Creek reservoir <br /> <br />8I))ina Bull~_______ <br />Rocky Mountain News Staff Wn'ter <br /> <br />AURORA - Cherry Creek Dam <br />would be inadequate in a worst- <br />case flood, but don't break out the <br />sandbags just yet. <br />"We consider this a problem, <br />but it does not mean there is an <br />immediate danger to people," s~id <br />Bill Miller, a project manager WIth <br />the Army Corps of Engineers at <br />-~the.regional office in Omaha~ . <br />The corps expects this fall to <br />begin a three-year study of options <br />for imorovinlI the dam. after hav- <br /> <br />ing revised its estimates of the <br />dam's capacity to withstand a <br />worst -case flood. <br />Among the options are raising <br />the crest of the dam 3 to 19 feet, <br />widening the spillway and adding a <br />side-channel spillway at the south- <br />western abutment to the dam. <br />The 3-mile~long dam was built <br />in 1950 for $15 million to control <br />the flow of Cherry Creek and keep <br />the creek within its channel. <br />Currently, the dam's spillway is <br />capable of handling 63% of water <br />from a catastrophic flood, accord- <br />ing to a 1993 hydrological report. <br />Engineers derived that percent- <br />age from updatedinforJl1<!tion frQm <br />the National Weather Service as <br /> <br />Rocky Mountain News <br /> <br />Tues., June 25,1996 <br /> <br /> <br />Flood figures based on rain estimat~s <br /> <br /> <br />DAM from 20A The corps ,:!ses that informat~n <br />to factor the Impact on a dam and <br />its ability to let excess water pass <br />through, Curran said. <br />A possible worst-cas~ rain- <br />storm or maximum probable pre- <br />cipitation, could be 10 inch_es of <br />rain in six hours, said LaB Tun- <br />nell a hydrologist with the weath- <br />er service in Denver. But such an <br />event would have a 1% chance of <br />happening in any given year. <br />"Federal regulations require <br />that dams, their spillways, have to <br />be able to accommodate what they <br />call a 100-year flood," Tunnell <br />said. "Our chances of rain to pro- <br />duce a flood in Cherry Creek is <br />higher than it used to be." . <br />The first year of the study could <br />cost up to $325,000 and would <br />begin after September. <br /> <br />well as newer design standards for <br />dams. <br />"Over time we get more data. <br />And if we designed a dam today, <br />we would use current criteria. <br />That's how we analyze a project <br />for dam safety," said Tom Curran, <br />a corps engineer in Omaha. <br />The corps figures the maximum <br />probable flood from the w~ather <br />service's figures for the maxImum <br />.~ probable precipitation. <br />The figures are determined by <br />estimating the greatest depth of <br />precipitation for a given duration <br />over a particular location at a cer- <br />tain time of the year, said Louis <br />Schreiner, a hydrometeorologist in <br />Denver.-=-=-' <br /> <br />The 3-mile-long Cherry Creek Dam was built in 1950 for $15 million to keep the waterway within its <br />See DAM on 21A h-:>nl.-c i:=vnortc nnlA' c::>" tho rl::>1'Yl 'c cnilllA'::>" "",.Irl h::>nrllo "nh, ~~ot. "f tho I^,,,,tor in '" "",t",ctr"nhi" fl""r/ <br /> <br />Steve GroerlRocky Mountain News <br />