My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10411
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10411
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:40:58 PM
Creation date
8/2/2007 4:13:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Denver
Community
Cherry Creek
Stream Name
Cherry Creek
Title
Article - A Flood of Alternatives
Date
3/13/1999
Prepared For
Public
Prepared By
The Denver Post
Floodplain - Doc Type
Correspondence
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~~. <br /> <br />MRR-16-1999 11:21 <br /> <br />P.02 <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />City Hall <br /> <br />. <br />I <br />6060. SmJrh Quebu S"ftl1t /. <br />Grl!eIIwood '.'iIlage, CV <br />. ~Ol /1-4591 i <br />I <br />f.W3; 773.0252 <br />,,'ox : 31)3 j 21.)1) . (jf] 3 I <br /> <br />---, <br />~ <br /> <br />. .>( <br />'-"'" <br /> <br />GREENWOOD VILLAGE <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Letters to the Editor <br />1560 Broadway <br />Denver, CO 80202 <br /> <br />~~ <br />o <br />,~ ~ <br />.y~ '~ <br />C'o';O/~ ? 6' ",D <br />;s'(!l-?- <i>OO /<' <br />-~6.' ~ \7/ <br />~i/G.... <br />"io-O" <br /> <br />f'\ <br />r" <br /> <br />Jt) <br />'C" \,-",OJ March IS, 1999 <br /> <br />In response to your March 13th editorial "A Flood of Alternatives," you seem to <br />accept the National Weather Service's in-house review, which was not an <br />independent revieW, as gospel. Since you apparently have not had the time to do <br />more research, here are some challenges to the NWS's data and procedures from <br />Dr. Ed Tomlinson. meteorologist from Monument, Colorado: <br /> <br />1. The terms "Probable Maximum Flood-I> which in turn is based on <br />"Probable Maximum Precipitation," are misleading terminology because both are <br />based on extremely improbable events with respect to thl~ Cherry Creek basin. <br /> <br />2. The Army Corps has assumed the Cherry Creek: Dam will fail following a <br />extraordinary improbable chain of events. <br /> <br />3. The probable maximum precipitation (PMP) is an event that has <br />somewhere between a one in a million and a one in a billion chance of occurring i <br />any single year. Unfortunately, the Army Corps will no longer quote probabilities <br />(ask them) because they have 'endured "bad press" when using these probabilities. <br />Their new bureaucratic position is that they now no longl:r have to estimate any <br />probabilities whatsoever! How convenient. <br /> <br />4. The site specific (pMP) study completed by the National Weather Servi.ce <br />has improperly applied meteorological procedures from publication illv1R52 to th <br />Cherry Creek basin. even though HMR55A specifically cautions against the use 0 <br />these in the Cherry Creek basin. <br /> <br />5. This error is further compounded by the assumption that the topographic <br />effects orthe Palmer Divide will increase rainfall in the Cherry Creek basin, which <br />is contrary to the basic meteorological principle that the Palmer Divide actually <br />decreas~~ precipitation north of the Palmer Divide into thl:l Cherry Creek basin. <br /> <br />6. The probable maximum flood used by the Army Corps is substantially <br />greater than the flood estimates prepared by other dam safety officials in the <br />western U.S.; such PMP estimates are typically 3 times the 100 year rain fall, <br />whereas the Corps' estimate is 7 times the 100 year rainfall event. <br /> <br />TOTAL P.02 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.