My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10406
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:41:01 PM
Creation date
8/2/2007 4:13:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Denver
Community
Cherry Creek
Stream Name
Cherry Creek
Title
Agenda Item 11.f Sept. 27-29, 1999 Board Meeting - Report Regarding the Cherry Creek Dam Safety Study
Date
9/17/1999
Prepared For
CWCB Board Members
Prepared By
Larry Lang
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-l <br /> <br />Fde: PMPtopics799summary.doc <br /> <br />D124r==-r <br /> <br />,.r <br /> <br />July 21,1999 <br /> <br />This referred to items done in?ydro 45 that were not needed for the antecedent <br />study. The time constraints diq' not affect the quality of the study. Group agreed <br />this was satisfactory answer. .. ' <br /> <br />15. The region within which storms should have meteorologically homogeneous <br />characteristics with storms that could occur over the Cherry Creek drainage basin is <br />defined on p2 of the study. The eastern most boundary of the region is 105.9 degrees <br />West longitude. In comparing this eastern limit with the 29 storms in deriving the <br />withinlwithoui storm curves in ~[R .52, there is no overlap. This appears to be stating <br />that any storms east of 105.9 degrees West are not to be considered to have <br />meteorologically homogeneous characteristics with the Cherry Creek drainage basin <br />location., The only Colorado storm used in withinlwithout curves derivation in ~fR <br />52 (Hale, 1935) does not fall within this region. This indicates an inconsistency <br />between this study and the site-specific P/ttfP study. (Tomlinson) <br /> <br />Correct that the boundary is 104.3 degrees longitude. No consensus is reached by <br />the group. The NWS will examine a way to verify this assumption <br /> <br />v <br /> <br />16. NWS HYDRO 45, dated January 1995, states on page 75, Finding 15 that "By <br />logical deduction and extension, the conclusion is that a reasonable and prudent <br />antecedent precipitation associated with a 3- to 5-day PMP event in the region of study <br />would be 10-20 percent of the PMP within a 31-day period centered on the day of <br />maximum precipitation in the PMP storm for the region of study." Explicitly what <br />caused the difference between this 10-2..0% and 32% provided in the Cherry Creek <br />antecedent precipitation study ? (Tomlinson) <br /> <br />We (USACE) will investigate the possiblity of and impacts from revising the <br />antecedent study. <br /> <br />17. Often dam regulators us!! the 100-year event, e.g. rainfall or snowmelt, as the <br />antecedent condition. What is the return frequency of the 32% PMP event for the <br />Cherry Creek drainage basin? If the PMP is seven times the 100-year rainfall, that <br />should make the antecedent rainfall 32% of seven or 2.24 times the 100-year rainfall <br />values. How iloes this compare to the antecedent rainfall used for other Corp Projects, <br />in particular Cochise and Elephant Butte in New Mexico? (Tomlinson) <br /> <br />The USACE guidelines state an antecedent flood of 50% of the PMF with a 5-day <br />drawdown or a half full flood control pool (which ever is more appropriate) is <br /> <br />..". -- - ~- " __ ,".. ~ ..- _~..; 1._ . 1__ __. _," _ . <br />~i=j=:c;;:'~ ::::,;,;:;"iTopia to 21 JIIly 1999 TeclurU:td Meeting <br />~~~~~':~~~#~~~~#_~.~'~;L:""'~'-'-:~';~~'::~~.~:~", - ." <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />::~~~~f;-~~::-~. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.