My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10398
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10398
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2010 12:52:42 PM
Creation date
8/2/2007 4:13:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Denver
Community
Cherry Creek
Stream Name
Cherry Creek
Title
Probable Maximum Precipitation Study for Cherry Creek Reservoir - Controversy
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Cherry Creek PMP Controversy <br /> <br />. The NWS completed a PMP analysis for the Cherry Creek basin above CC dam on behalf <br />of the Corps of Engineers. Study results were published in July 1995. <br /> <br />. The 1995 PMP study has not received an acceptable "peer review" by local/regional <br />experts outside of the federal government. <br /> <br />. NWS published PMP value is 24.7 inches over 72 hours, which results in a peak inflow of <br />524,000 cfs, and a volume of 262,500 acre-feet. These values are considerably higher than <br />those used for the original dam design. <br /> <br />. There have been on-going concerns from Colorado inlterests and local experts regarding the <br />validity and accuracy of the NWS study results. <br /> <br />. Some examples of technical concerns from Colorado experts: <br />1. Why ha4 the NWS been unwilling to hand over technical backup data for peer <br />review? <br />2. Is the PMP storm area and storm centering appropriate for this basin? <br />3. What is the western limit for the application of HMR 52 and how was it derived? <br />4. Are HMR 52 or HMR 55a even appropriate for use in the Cherry Creek basin? <br />5. Have orographic effects been properly accounted for? <br />6. What is an acceptable ratio of PMP rainfall to 100-year rainfall? <br />7. Will the NWS fix the problems found regarding their analysis of the antecedent <br />rainfall conditions? <br /> <br />. The big controversy: The revised PMP and resulting PMF make the Cherry Creek dam <br />inadequate according to federal guidelines. In order to meet dam safety regulations, the <br />Corps has a responsibility to fix the problem. Unfortunately, fixing the problem will <br />adversely affect public and private property in many ways, will cost lO's of millions of <br />dollars using taxpayers money, and may not even be necessary given the true risk <br />associated with such a low probability event. <br /> <br />. The State is interested in developing a reasonable and acceptable PMP value for Cherry <br />Creek that everybody can live with. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.