Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.01/04/2000 18:00 <br /> <br />402-221-4890 <br /> <br />CORPS OF ENGINEERS <br /> <br />PAGE 03/05 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br />2 <br /> <br />Required Service <br /> <br />The selectee is to provide a written review of the Study. <br />It is desired that the. selectee not produce a new, site-specific <br />analysis for the Cherry Creek Watershed, but only a review of the <br />July 13, 1995 Study. The following questions/items should be <br />addressed in the written review: <br /> <br />1. Was it appropriate to use a comprehensive (general) report. in which Prv1P is <br /> <br />defined for ranges of storm area size and duration. as a starting point and <br /> <br />foundation for the site-specific study? <br /> <br />2. Does earlier or subsequent storm information from the region surrounding the. <br /> <br />Cherry Creek Watershed provide evidence to question the use of the particular <br /> <br /> <br />comprehensive PMP report, namely Hydrometeorological Report (HMR) 55A, <br /> <br /> <br />used as the foundation for the site-specific study? <br /> <br />3. Were the techniques used to produce the site-specific values of PM? reasonable <br /> <br />and appropriate, and if not, were there alternative techniques that would have been <br /> <br />more reasonable and appropriate? <br />