My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12607
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12607
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:48 PM
Creation date
8/2/2007 3:08:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.102.01.K
Description
CO River Basin Water Projects - Aspinall Unit - General - Section 7 Consultation-Biological Opinion
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
9/1/2000
Author
Floyd Ciruli
Title
Water and Public Opinion - Special Report - Floyd Ciruli - Ciruli Associates - Re-Gunnison PBO and Related Issues - 09-01-00
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001227 <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />Water Planning a Priority <br /> <br />Data in both surveys indicates that. ~ater pl{inning is an urgent public priority. For example, <br />planning for the use of Water ranks first in a list of five resource and facility uses being <br />impacted by growth. In fact, it ranked higher than planning for roads and highways, schools, <br />electricity and recreation. (Statewide survey) <br /> <br />This heightened concern is likely a reflection of numerous drought stories that have appeared <br />since the beginning of the year. Transportation, which has been the highest-ranking concern, <br />may have moved down in importance due to the attention it received from state government <br />and passage of the 1999 highway and transit bonds. <br /> <br />In both the Douglas County and statewide survey, more than 90 percent of voters. agree the <br />state of Colorado should develop a "plan for future droughts" including storage of "more <br />water above and below ground." <br /> <br />Concern About Shortage in Five Years <br /> <br />Residents in Douglas County and the rest of the state believe their own household water supply <br />for the next five years is adequate, but expect shortages for the broader area (i.e., for the <br />county or the state), <br /> <br />Water Quantity <br /> <br />Douglas County <br /> <br />Statewide <br /> <br />Quantitv <br /> <br />In the <br />County <br /> <br />A tour <br />Home <br /> <br />In the <br />State <br /> <br />At our <br />Home <br /> <br />Adequate <br />Shortage <br /> <br />35% <br />52 <br /> <br />68% <br />24 <br /> <br />34% <br />56 <br /> <br />66% <br />29 <br /> <br />State and Local Responsibility for Water Planning <br /> <br />Douglas County and Colorado residents believe responsibility for water planning and adequacy <br />is shared by state and local government. Local water providers are responsible for local <br />needs, including cooperation with other water agencies, conservation and storage. The state <br />is responsible for drought planning, water storage investments and, in general, maintaining the <br />quality of life. <br /> <br />Rationing <br /> <br />As the Douglas County survey first showed and the statewide survey confirmed, residents say <br />they will accept water rationing. However, they are reluctant to change their lifestyle. For <br />example reducing their lawns or the surrounding green space is supported by a slim majority. <br />And they are very hostile to increasing the cost of water. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.