My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12606
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12606
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:48 PM
Creation date
8/2/2007 3:08:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.102.01.K
Description
CO River Basin Water Projects - Aspinall Unit - General - Section 7 Consultation-Biological Opinion
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/1/2000
Author
Unknown
Title
Black Canyon Information Paper - Attachments A-C - Re-Gunnison PBO and Related Issues - 10-01-2000
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0012~7. <br /> <br />BLACK CANYON INFORMATION PAPER <br /> <br />Oct. 2000 <br /> <br />3. Sufficient water to permit pealcing power generation of 40,000 kilowatts at the Morrow Point <br />powerplant for 217 hours a month. <br />4. Sufficient water to provide a minimumjIow of 100 second-feet in the Gunnison River through <br />the Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument. <br /> <br />The stated objective was to prevent uncontroUed spills as much as possible during high runoff and <br />yet assure a full reservoir on July 31, When water was released to make room for floodflows, the <br />power generation used was up to the full capacity. It was assumed that sufficient storage to meet <br />the Gunnison tunnel requirements would be provided from Taylor Park Reservoir and at times of <br />low flow the Curecanti unit would pass through the Taylor Park releases for delivery at the <br />Gunnison tunnel. <br /> <br />At page 18 the report states: It is noteworthy that even with the restrictive operating criteria <br />used and the relatively small active reservoir storage capacity, only an average of 47, 000 acre- <br />feet o/water annually spilled at Blue Mesa during the 1971-2014 period, less than 5 percent of <br />the average runoff at the site. The Curecanti unit reservoirs will thus provide essentially <br />complete control of available streamflow for power production during years of average and <br />below average runoff but will not have sufficient storage capacity to completely regulate flows <br />during extended periods of ahove-average nmoff. Sufficient storage capacity will he available <br />to smooth out the flows somewhat during the year hy storing early spring flows for later releases. <br />Operation of the unit will also provide some storage holdover from high runoff years to low <br />years. Under the operating criteria, the minimum summer releases from the Curecanti unit will <br />exceed the present minimum flow in the river. <br /> <br />The National Park Service prepared a report included in Chapter 6, Cooperative Planning. <br />In that report the Se~ce only discusses the recreational development potential at the reservoir <br />sites. It does not discuss impacts on the National Monument. (page 25-26) <br /> <br />Another report by the National Park Service is included in a section on reports by cooperating <br />agencies. It does not mention any concerns or operational requirements for the National <br />Monument. (pages 51-63) <br /> <br />B-8 <br /> <br />'-.~..> - <br /> <br />~"".. .<'" , <br /> <br />.. ;..... .~-' .' ....;.:!o: ~:.~. <br /> <br />-_-." .-. ..... '0 <br /> <br />, ' <br /> <br />- - '. .......... ....~. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.