My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12606
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12606
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:48 PM
Creation date
8/2/2007 3:08:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.102.01.K
Description
CO River Basin Water Projects - Aspinall Unit - General - Section 7 Consultation-Biological Opinion
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/1/2000
Author
Unknown
Title
Black Canyon Information Paper - Attachments A-C - Re-Gunnison PBO and Related Issues - 10-01-2000
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001243 <br /> <br />BLACK CANYON INFORMATION PAPER <br /> <br />Oct. 2000 <br /> <br />The Commissioner's letter of November 13, 1953, to the Secretary of the Interior, p. 38 provides <br />a supplemental report on the CRSP dated October 1953, stating at p. 42: <br />15. After reviewing the proposed report the State of Colorado recommended that the Whitewater <br />unit on the Gunnison River not be included as an initial unit of the Colorado River storage <br />project. Although desiring one of the initial units to be located on the Gunnison River, the State <br />at that time had not decided which of the several possible units should be selected, and <br />recommended that certain further studies be made of the Gunnison River units before final <br />selection is made. Further study was given by the Bureau of Reclamation to the location of <br />storage units on the Gunnison River, in accordance with this recommendation, and information <br />was made available to the State. The director of the Colorado Water Conservation Board has <br />recently advised us 'that the board has approwd a reservoir at the Curecanti site with a storage <br />capacity of 940,000 acre-feet, and has urged 1 hat this project be included as a part of the initial <br />authorization of the Colorado River storage project. Analyses of the Colorado River storage <br />project with both the large Curecanti (2,500,000 acre-feet) and the small Curecanti (940,000 <br />acre-feet) are included as attachments to this j"eport. These analyses indicate that power from <br />either unit would be more expensive, under present-day estimated costs, than power from <br />alternative sources. We believe that power needs of the western slope area can be taken care of, <br />for the time being at least, by use of energy from the recommended units. Colorado will need <br />more power as well as storage capacity in the immediate future. Every effort should be made to <br />assure means of meeting that need, and to that end the Congress may wish to consider <br />authorization of the Curecanti or some other storage in western Colorado. <br /> <br />The Regional Director's Report of December 1950, on CRSP and Participating Projects, Region <br />4, is at page 59. This was an Interim report on the Colorado River storage project and <br />participating projects. <br /> <br />2. The Colorado River storage project would consist of a combination of dams, reservoirs, <br />powerplants, and other appurtenant structures on the upper Colorado River and its principal <br />tributaries. Included as appurtenant structUrf:'S would be facilities recommended by cooperating <br />Federal agencies for multiple-purpose development of the upper Colorado River Basin's water <br />resources. The project reservoirs would regulate the flow of the river, assure the delivery of <br />water to the lower basin as required by the Colorado River compact, and further the use in the <br />upper basin of water apportioned by the compact. Part of the capacity of some of the reservoirs <br />would store water for direct use in the upper basin. Revenues from the sale of project-generated <br />power would be sufficient to pay all reimbursable Colorado River storage-project costs and <br />assist irrigators in payment of costs of other projects that would utilize water of the upper <br />Colorado River system. Projects that would be so assisted are refe"ed to as 'participating <br />projects. ' All projects authorized subsequent to approval of the upper Colorado <br />River Basin compact that would consume water of the upper Colorado River system are <br />considered to be dependent on the storage project for an assured water supply. Such projects, <br />therefore, are designated 'dependent projects. '(po 69) <br /> <br />In the plan of development for the CRSP: 10. Ten units, each including a dam, reservoir, and <br />appurtenant power facilities, would constitute the Colorado River storage project. The dams <br />would be located above Lee Ferry on the Colorado River and its principal tributaries. Eight of <br />B-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.